Paper VI visual guide · Visual 19 of 42 · FINITE DIFFERENCES / A QUARTIC TEST PROBLEM

Convergence with a nonzero exact error

Traditional Part I: Theorems 11.1--11.2. Exact nodal inversion and the scale of low-mode errors.

Start reading

Resources & source

Original plate in the visual guide PDF · Original atlas source

Skip contents and start reading

Use \(u(x)=x-x^4\), which vanishes at both endpoints and solves \(-u''=12x^2\). Its centered second difference is not exact:

\[ L_hu|_{\rm nodes}=12x_i^2+2h^2. \]

Since the stencil differentiates the quadratic \(x(1-x)\) exactly, the solution \(u_h\) to the sampled forcing \(12x_i^2\) satisfies

\[ \boxed{u_h(x_i)-u(x_i)=-h^2x_i(1-x_i).} \]

This gives both the sign and size of the error, rather than merely a log–log slope.

Three finite-difference error curves shrink as the mesh is refined.
Original drawing. Read the description below; expand the labels and data for selectable text.

Reading the drawing

The curves give the stated quartic test problem at three grid spacings. The table on the right pairs each spacing with its maximum error. The formula above the plot states the exact error profile for this example.

Drawing labels and data 12 labels

Read the original labels as selectable text. Tables preserve grid relationships; other short labels are grouped compactly.

  • 0
  • 0.25
  • 0.5
  • 0.75
  • 1
  • 0
  • \(x\)
  • \(|u_h-u|=h^2x(1-x)\)
  • grid spacing \(h\) maximum error

\(\frac{1}{4}\) \(\frac{1}{64}\)

\(\frac{1}{8}\) \(\frac{1}{256}\)

\(\frac{1}{16}\) \(\frac{1}{1024}\)

Open the full-size drawing

Evidence note from the source edition

The three curves show magnitudes of the exact nodal errors for \(h=1/4,1/8,1/16\). Lines between grid points are visual guides, not an additional continuous numerical solution. The error is negative on every interior node.

One refinement divides this error by four

All three grids include \(x=1/2\), where the maximum absolute nodal error is \(h^2/4\). It equals \(1/64\), \(1/256\), and \(1/1024\), respectively. Exact rational matrix inversion verifies these values independently of the closed error formula.

The manuscript also compares the discrete eigenvalues

\[ \lambda_{k,h}=4h^{-2}\sin^2(k\pi h/2) \]

with \((k\pi)^2\), with error at most \((k\pi)^4h^2/12\). For a fixed mode \(k\), the bound tends to zero quadratically. It does not claim a uniform small error for modes whose index grows like \(1/h\).

The nodal Green identity is exact, while the discretization of the differential equation still has a truncation error. These statements concern different comparisons and do not contradict one another.

Read this as

An exact inverse of the discrete operator does not make that operator equal to the differential operator. Keep algebraic inversion and continuum approximation separate.

Source and conversion record

The original atlas wording, equations, and drawing labels are retained. Drawings are views of the frozen visual-guide PDF. Text descriptions and table headings are added reading aids. This conversion does not rebuild TeX, rerun the examples, audit proofs or compile Lean.

Conversion checks and source hashes

Notation in Paper VI

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index