Quantum and CircuitsReading edition

Scaling phase diagrams for charge, particles, and local dimension

Reading tools
Reading libraryFind statementsInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Original TeX with line links · Download TeX

The wording and mathematics follow the retained manuscript. This reading format does not add a proof review or extend Lean coverage.

Skip contents and start reading

4.9 Scaling phase diagrams for charge, particles, and local dimension

4.9.1 Exact sector size is a complexity phase variable

The statement “fixed particle number is polynomial” has a sharp extension. Let the particle number depend on the system size:

\[ k=k(n). \]

The explicit-amplitude simulation cost of one fermionic or qubit weight packet is governed by

\[ D_{n,k}=\binom nk. \]

For \(1\le k\le n\), the standard bounds

\[ \left(\frac nk\right)^k \le \binom nk \le \left(\frac{en}{k}\right)^k \]
(4.13)

show that the growth changes continuously between polynomial and exponential regimes.

Because

\[ \binom nk=\binom n{n-k}, \]

write

\[ r(n)=\min\{k(n),n-k(n)\}. \]

Theorem 4.11: Explicit fixed-charge phase diagram

For explicit amplitude storage in a weight-\(k(n)\) packet:

  1. the packet dimension is polynomial in \(n\) if \(r(n)=O(1)\);

  2. the packet dimension is superpolynomial whenever \(r(n)\to\infty\);

  3. if \(r(n)=O(\log n)\), then

    \[ D_{n,k}=2^{O((\log n)^2)}, \]

    so the explicit packet simulation is quasipolynomial;

  4. if \(r(n)=O(n^\alpha)\) for a fixed \(0<\alpha<1\), then

    \[ D_{n,k}=2^{O(n^\alpha\log n)}, \]

    which is subexponential;

  5. if \(k(n)/n\to p\in(0,1)\), then

    \[ \log_2 D_{n,k} = nH_2(k(n)/n)+O(\log n) = nH_2(p)+o(n), \]

    where \(H_2\) is binary entropy, and the packet remains exponential.

Proof

The upper bounds follow from Equation (4.13). If \(r=O(1)\), then \(\binom nr=O(n^r)\). Conversely, suppose \(r\to\infty\) and \(r\le n/2\). If \(r\le\sqrt n\), then

\[ \log\binom nr \ge r\log(n/r) \ge \frac r2\log n, \]

whose ratio to \(\log n\) diverges. If \(r>\sqrt n\), then

\[ \log\binom nr \ge r\log2 \ge \sqrt n\log2, \]

which also dominates every constant multiple of \(\log n\). For the final assertion, \(p_n=k(n)/n\) stays in a compact subinterval of \((0,1)\). Stirling's formula gives

\[ \log_2\binom n{k(n)} =nH_2(p_n)-\frac12\log_2\!\bigl(2\pi n p_n(1-p_n)\bigr)+O(1/n). \]

The logarithmic term is \(O(\log n)\), uniformly on that subinterval. Continuity of \(H_2\) gives \(nH_2(p_n)=nH_2(p)+o(n)\). Replacing \(p_n\) by its limit inside an \(O(\log n)\) estimate would require a convergence rate, which is not assumed here.

Derived theorem or corollary

For the explicit occupation-amplitude representation, “few particles” means a bounded number of particles or holes. A slowly growing charge can still improve on full state-vector scaling, but it no longer guarantees membership in \(P\).

4.9.2 A bounded-excitation hierarchy

The union of the first \(K\) weight sectors has dimension

\[ D_{\le K}(n) = \sum_{k=0}^{K}\binom nk. \]

For fixed \(K\),

\[ D_{\le K}(n)=O(n^K). \]

If \(K=O(\log n)\), the same union is quasipolynomial. This refines Corollary 3.16: bounded symmetry breaking preserves polynomial simulation, while logarithmically growing excitation gives a controlled quasipolynomial regime.

4.9.3 Bosonic and fermionic analogues

For \(N\) fermions in \(m\) modes,

\[ D_{\mathrm F}(m,N)=\binom mN. \]

For \(N\) bosons in \(m\) modes,

\[ D_{\mathrm B}(m,N)=\binom{m+N-1}{N}. \]

The same binomial analysis gives:

Corollary 4.12: Few-particle scaling

With the number of modes as the input-size parameter:

  1. fixed \(N\) gives polynomial explicit-amplitude simulation;

  2. \(N=O(\log m)\) gives quasipolynomial sector size;

  3. \(N=O(m^\alpha)\), \(0<\alpha<1\), gives subexponential sector size;

  4. finite-density fermionic sectors remain exponential.

For bosons, the statements hold in the dilute regime with the same occupation-basis access assumptions.

The adjective “polynomial” here refers to the sector dimension and efficient gate action. It does not assert that every interacting Hamiltonian has efficiently computable matrix elements or that every compact description remains closed.

4.9.4 Symmetric qudits with growing local dimension

The symmetric \(d\)-level subspace has dimension

\[ S(n,d) = \binom{n+d-1}{d-1}. \]

For fixed \(d\), this is polynomial in \(n\). If \(d=d(n)\) grows, the same phase transition appears.

Proposition 4.13: Growing-local-dimension boundary

In the explicit occupation basis:

  1. fixed \(d\) gives \(S(n,d)=O(n^{d-1})\);

  2. \(d=O(\log n)\) gives \(S(n,d)=2^{O((\log n)^2)}\);

  3. unbounded \(d\) is not covered by the fixed-\(d\) polynomial-collapse theorem without an additional internal compression.

Thus permutation symmetry removes the exponential tensor-product multiplicity only when the number of local levels is controlled, or when the occupation record itself admits a second compression.

The active dimension passes through polynomial, quasipolynomial, subexponential, and exponential regimes as particle number grows.
Figure 4.9. The active dimension passes through polynomial, quasipolynomial, subexponential, and exponential regimes as particle number grows.

View full-size figure (new tab)

4.9.5 Complexity class versus practical runtime

A polynomial sector can still have a large exponent. Fixed \(k=20\) gives \(O(n^{20})\) explicit amplitudes, which is in \(P\) but may be impractical. Conversely, a subexponential sector may be useful at moderate size without changing the formal complexity class.

A complete performance claim should therefore report both:

\[ \text{asymptotic class} \qquad\text{and}\qquad \text{actual representation size and update cost}. \]

This is why the benchmark chapters keep wall-clock evidence separate from the dimension theorems.

Source and conversion record

Source SHA-256: ebaee84823d3aaef001d43588d779e3f10d7336de3194c466e8e8121bfb460f1

Unsupported prose commands stop the build. The mathematical expression sequence is checked against the source, with manuscript macros expanded for display.

Conversion records

Notation in Quantum and Circuits

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index