12.2 Reusable theorem templates
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5034
12.2.1 Purpose
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5041
This chapter collects proof architectures that recur across gate logics. Each template separates the easy upper-bound identity from the difficult lower-bound obligation. The templates are not claims that every gate hierarchy satisfies the hypotheses.
12.2.2 Template I: catalytic conjugation
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5044
Let \(H\le G\) have restricted and ambient costs with \({\ell_{\mathrm{amb}}}(g^{-1})={\ell_{\mathrm{amb}}}(g)\). Choose \(g\in G\) and \(h_1,\ldots,h_m\in H\) such that
Then
Theorem 12.2: Catalytic comparison template
Assume a restricted lower bound of the form
where \(r_i\) is the restricted cost of the \(i\)th transported obligation and \(\beta\) is the maximum certified sharing. Then
The proof is immediate. The research content lies in bounding \(\beta\).
12.2.3 Template II: amortized consumers
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5075
Suppose a catalyst costs \(c_{\mathrm{open}}+c_{\mathrm{close}}\) and each of \(m\) consumers saves at least \(s_i\) restricted cost. Then
where \(r\) is repair or interference cost. A threshold occurs when the right side first becomes positive.
This template explains the three-cross rule in the linear atom and guides searches in phase, Gaussian, and routing models.
12.2.4 Template III: first-arrival Green valuation
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5087
Let \(S\) be a finite symmetric generating set and
Then
Theorem 12.3: First-arrival template
If word multiplicities are nonnegative, then
For restricted and ambient sets,
This template provides an exact spectral restatement. To turn it into a lower bound without enumeration, one needs control of the endpoint projector coefficients.
12.2.5 Template IV: one-Lipschitz potentials
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5111
Let \(F\) be a function on circuit states satisfying
for every allowed restricted gate \(s\). Then
Potential design steps:
choose a decomposition into cuts, packets, or degree layers;
prove a gate changes the total charge by at most its cost;
ensure cancellations cannot create free progress on many layers;
evaluate the target exactly.
Static sums of ranks are often too coarse in ambient models; time-expanded or target-relative potentials may be required.
12.2.6 Template V: dimension per gate
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5132
Let \(X\) be an algebraic family of elementary gates whose irreducible components have dimension at most \(r\). Let \(V\) be an irreducible target variety of dimension \(N\).
Theorem 12.4: Dimension-per-gate template
The closure of the locus reachable in \(L\) gates has dimension at most \(rL\). If \(rL<N\), a generic point of \(V\) is not reachable in \(L\) gates.
If every target in \(V\) has a restricted construction of length at most \(N/r\), then generic restricted and ambient lengths coincide at that value, provided the same parameter bound applies to the ambient alphabet.
12.2.7 Template VI: defect codimension
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5141
Assume every target has restricted cost at most \(M\). A defect of size at least \(d\) implies ambient cost at most \(M-d\). If the \((M-d)\)-gate ambient locus has dimension at most \(N-d\), then
This is the general mechanism behind algebraic rarity.
12.2.8 Template VII: finite-field sparsity
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5148
Suppose there are at most \(B\) gate directions and at most \(q^r\) parameter choices per gate over \({\mathbb F}_q\). Then the number of words of length at most \(L\) is at most
If the target family has \(q^N\) points and defect \(d\) forces \(L\le (N-d)/r\), this yields a density bound of order \(q^{-d}\) up to a fixed combinatorial factor.
The estimate counts words, not distinct endpoints, and is therefore an upper bound without injectivity assumptions.
12.2.9 Template VIII: block retraction
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5157
Let a large restricted group contain a smaller one through a homomorphic embedding \(\iota\), and suppose a homomorphic retraction \(\pi\) satisfies \(\pi\iota=\operatorname{id}\). Require that every large restricted generator maps to a small restricted word of no greater cost. Then
If the ambient embedding preserves gate cost,
This transfers a catalytic atom to architectures containing it as a retract.
12.2.10 Template IX: exact block coupling
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5172
For block-lower matrices
projection to diagonal blocks forces the costs of \(A\) and \(D\), while rank of the cross block forces at least \({\operatorname{rank}} X\) cross transmissions. If \(X\) is a partial monomial matrix, the lower bound is attained by direct construction.
The same logic extends to trees of blocks whenever every coupling layer has an exact rank certificate and the projections are homomorphisms.
12.2.11 Template X: tensor Leibniz rule
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5185
Suppose a restricted complexity is tree tight and satisfies
for \(A\) of size \(m\) and \(B\) of size \(n\). If ambient complexity satisfies the corresponding upper bound, then
For tensor powers,
This is the standard route from a finite atom to an \(N\log N\) defect.
12.2.12 Template XI: stable capacity
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5205
If
then
is subadditive and
exists by Fekete's lemma. This defines a regularized ambient cost and exposes possible tensor activation.
12.2.13 Template XII: vector costs
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5220
Let gates carry costs in \({\mathbb R}_+^k\). A lower bound may be a vector inequality
or a family of scalar inequalities indexed by dual weights \(w\in{\mathbb R}_+^k\):
A complete Pareto proof may require enough supporting weights to separate the restricted and ambient convex lower hulls.
12.2.14 Template XIII: ancilla restoration
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5231
Let \(W\) act on data \(D\) and ancilla \(A\). To certify a dirty catalyst, prove the operator identity
on the full joint space, not only on one ancilla input. For a clean catalyst, prove
for all \({\lvert \psi\rangle}\). The distinction changes both the target equations and lower bounds.
12.2.15 Template XIV: symmetry-sector escape
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5243
Given projectors \(P_q\), define off-sector transfer blocks
A restricted gate preserves all diagonal sectors. An ambient gate changes a controlled collection of blocks. A candidate potential is a weighted sum of ranks or norms of obligations relative to the final target. The proof must charge both creation and useful consumption of off-sector coherence.
12.2.16 Template XV: exhaustive threshold classification
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5250
A finite first-threshold theorem should contain:
no defects below size \(n_0\);
at least one defect at \(n_0\);
exact classification of every defect at \(n_0\) modulo declared equivalence;
analytic generation of the exceptional motifs;
equality between the analytic set and computational census;
witness and completeness certificates.
This is the standard achieved by the six-wire linear core and is the target standard for future gate logics.
12.2.17 A proof-obligation ledger
On this page · Permalink · Source line 5262
Before promoting a catalytic identity to a theorem, record:
| Obligation | Required evidence |
|---|---|
| Endpoint membership | Symbolic proof that the target lies in the restricted class. |
| Ambient upper bound | Explicit circuit evaluated exactly. |
| Restricted lower bound | Potential, rank, algebraic, search, or certificate argument. |
| Restoration | Identity on all data and work inputs under the chosen convention. |
| Cost compatibility | Same gate alphabet, weights, and free operations in both metrics. |
| Minimal threshold | Exhaustive or symbolic exclusion of smaller instances. |
| Equivalence classification | Orbit or normal-form analysis of all minimal defects. |
| Amplification | Proof that the lower bound and upper construction compose. |
| Reproducibility | Source, frozen outputs, and deterministic commands. |