Quantum and CircuitsReading edition

Relative phase is absent from one histogram and present in another

Reading tools
Reading libraryFind statementsInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Original TeX with line links · Download TeX

The wording and mathematics follow the retained manuscript. This reading format does not add a proof review or extend Lean coverage.

Skip contents and start reading

1.10 Relative phase is absent from one histogram and present in another

For a normalized state \(|v\rangle=\sum_nv(n)|n\rangle\), the standard-basis probabilities are \(|v(n)|^2\). In the basis analyzed by \(F^\dagger\), the probabilities are \(|(F^\dagger v)(k)|^2\).

These describe two measurement procedures on separately prepared copies. Measuring the first histogram on a particular copy does not preserve that copy as a coherent input for the second procedure.

Theorem QA13: Equal initial probabilities and orthogonal states

The states \(\psi\) and \(\chi\) have identical probabilities in the original basis and are orthogonal:

\[ |\psi(n)|^2=|\chi(n)|^2\quad\text{for all }n, \qquad \langle\psi,\chi\rangle=0. \]

Proof

Squaring a real number or its absolute value gives the same result, proving the first claim. For orthogonality,

\[ \langle\psi,\chi\rangle =\frac1{48}\sum_{n=0}^{11}c(n)|c(n)|. \]

The positive entries contribute \(16+4+4=24\), and the negative entries contribute \(-4-16-4=-24\). Their sum is zero. \(\square\)

This is a strong information boundary. The states are distinct even after the physically irrelevant overall phase is disregarded. Orthogonal normalized states cannot be scalar multiples of one another. Yet their original-basis probability histograms are identical.

Theorem QA14: Complete arithmetic phase separation

After applying \(F^\dagger\),

\[ \Pr_{F^\dagger\psi}(k\in U_{12})=1, \qquad \Pr_{F^\dagger\chi}(k\in U_{12})=0. \]

More explicitly,

\[ (F^\dagger\psi)(k) =\begin{cases}1/2,&k\in\{1,5,7,11\},\\0,&\text{otherwise},\end{cases} \]

whereas

\[ (F^\dagger\chi)(k) =\begin{cases} 2/3,&k\in\{0,6\},\\ 1/6,&k\in\{2,4,8,10\},\\ 0,&\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \]

Proof

QA12 gives the first amplitude table. For the second, set \(a(n)=|c(n)|\). Its vector is

\[ a=(4,0,2,0,2,0,4,0,2,0,2,0). \]

It has period six. Pairing \(n\) and \(n+6\) in its twelve-point transform produces a factor \(1+(-1)^k\), so every odd transform coefficient vanishes. For \(k=2\ell\), its transform is twice the six-point transform of \((4,0,2,0,2,0)\). The doubled transform is sixteen when \(\ell\) is divisible by three and four otherwise, as one sees from

\[ 2\left(4+2e^{-2\pi i\ell/3}+2e^{-4\pi i\ell/3}\right). \]

When \(\ell\equiv0\pmod3\), the bracket is eight. Otherwise the two cubic phases sum to minus one and the bracket is two. Thus

\[ \widehat a=(16,0,4,0,4,0,16,0,4,0,4,0). \]

State normalization and the unitary inverse transform divide this table by \(\sqrt{48}\sqrt{12}=24\), producing the second amplitude table. Its support is even, while every label in \(U_{12}\) is odd. The selected probability is therefore zero. The signed state has four probabilities of \(1/4\), with total one. \(\square\)

The full probability comparison is:

Quantum probabilities before and after the inverse Fourier transform
LabelInitial probability, both statesAfter \(F^\dagger\), signed stateAfter \(F^\dagger\), unsigned state
0\(1/3\)\(0\)\(4/9\)
1\(0\)\(1/4\)\(0\)
2\(1/12\)\(0\)\(1/36\)
3\(0\)\(0\)\(0\)
4\(1/12\)\(0\)\(1/36\)
5\(0\)\(1/4\)\(0\)
6\(1/3\)\(0\)\(4/9\)
7\(0\)\(1/4\)\(0\)
8\(1/12\)\(0\)\(1/36\)
9\(0\)\(0\)\(0\)
10\(1/12\)\(0\)\(1/36\)
11\(0\)\(1/4\)\(0\)

Every column sums to one. The Fourier probability supports are disjoint. Negative amplitudes in the original arithmetic signal therefore encode observable relative phase, even though their signs do not appear in the first probability column.

Theorem QA15: No inverse from the initial histogram alone

There is no function from original-basis probability histograms to state vectors that reconstructs both \(\psi\) and \(\chi\). There is also no reconstruction of both states up to overall phase from that histogram alone.

Proof

The two histograms are equal by QA13. A function assigns the same output to equal inputs, so it cannot output the two distinct vectors. For the phase-insensitive formulation, QA13 shows that the states are orthogonal and normalized. If \(\chi=\lambda\psi\) for any complex scalar of modulus one, then \(\langle\psi,\chi\rangle=\lambda\ne0\), a contradiction. \(\square\)

The first formulation is formalized in the later publication module. The strengthening to equivalence up to global phase is a prose corollary proved here. It is not counted as an additional inherited Lean declaration.

Source and conversion record

Source SHA-256: 27e2a58abc6b464edd826fc32131936fb714ba184eff04b2000abed701f087e3

Unsupported prose commands stop the build. The mathematical expression sequence is checked against the source, with manuscript macros expanded for display.

Conversion records

Notation in Quantum and Circuits

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index