Paper V visual guide · Visual 40 of 40 · THE TWO ERRORS / A COMPLETE READING CONTRACT

Conditional Gibbs control closes the reconstruction estimate

Traditional monograph: Theorem E11.2 (p. 72), Theorem E11.3 (p. 73).

Recorded evidence for Paper V

Start reading

Resources & source

Original plate in the visual guide PDF · Original atlas source

Skip contents and start reading

The exact retained-packet approximation shares the same discontinuity as its target. If \(f=s+j\) and \(Q_ms\to s\) uniformly, then

\[ \|f-(Q_ms+j)\|_\infty=\|s-Q_ms\|_\infty\longrightarrow0. \]

The approximants themselves may be discontinuous. There is no conflict with the failure of continuous Fourier polynomials to converge uniformly to a jump.

Fourier comparison with a retained discontinuity packet
Original drawing. A text description follows.

Reading the drawing

The plot compares a signal containing a jump, a Fourier approximation and a reconstruction that retains the jump packet. The Fourier curve oscillates near the jump while the packet reconstruction follows the chosen target. This plot illustrates a conditional approximation comparison; it supplies no independent recovery certificate.

Open the full-size drawing

Evidence note from the source edition

Preserved vector figure from the expanded source. It illustrates the choice of approximation target; it is not an independent universal recovery certificate.

Estimated packets need the operator norm too

If the bounded linear operators satisfy \(\sup_m\|Q_m\|_{L^p\to L^p}\le C_Q\), then

\[ \|f-\widehat f_m\|_p \le\|s-Q_ms\|_p+(1+C_Q)\|j-\widehat j_m\|_p. \]

For an orthogonal \(L^2\) projection one may use \(\|I-Q_m\|\le1\), sharpening the packet multiplier to one. Such a bound must be justified in the norm actually being used. In particular, uniform boundedness of Fourier partial sums in the supremum norm is not supplied by this theorem.

What the complete guide establishes

V1 to V26 preserve the original worked layer. V27 to V40 explain the additional traditional developments, outside the inherited twenty-result Lean map. The new exact examples have their own finite arithmetic record. They do not extend the formal coverage merely by appearing beside formally mapped results. The final package keeps current computations and inherited compiler reports attached to their stated scope. The symbolic visual suite was rerun, with 181 checks passed and seven invalid controls rejected. Lean compiler evidence remains inherited. No fresh Lean run is claimed.

Read this as

A complete error claim specifies the signal class, the recovered packet, the approximation operator, and the norm. Each term can then be improved and checked on its own terms.

Source and conversion record

The original atlas wording, equations, and drawing labels are retained. Drawings are views of the frozen visual-guide PDF. Text descriptions and table headings are added reading aids. This conversion does not rebuild TeX, rerun the examples, audit proofs or compile Lean.

Conversion checks and source hashes

Notation in Paper V

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index