Paper VII visual guide · Visual 34 of 40 · SIGN, STABILITY, AND A CONVERGENT EXPANSION

Control the hidden spectral response

Traditional edition: Theorem II.9.4, Proposition II.9.5, Theorem II.9.12.

Start reading

Resources & source

Original plate in the monograph PDF · Original atlas source

Skip contents and start reading

Retain one coordinate in \(H={\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&2\end{pmatrix}}\), so \(A=0\), \(B=1\), and \(D=2\). In its elimination domain, \(\Sigma(z)=1/(z-2)\). At \(z=3+{\mathrm i}\),

\[ \Sigma(3+{\mathrm i})=\frac{1-{\mathrm i}}{2},\qquad \Im\Sigma(z)=-(\Im z)\left|(z-2)^{-1}\right|^2\leq0. \]

The sign in the upper half plane comes from self-adjoint hidden data. It is not an entrywise sign condition on an arbitrary effective matrix.

Two hidden-sector models are compared at one spectral point.
Original drawing. Read the description below; expand the labels and data for selectable text.

Reading the drawing

The boxes list the original and perturbed coupling data and self-energies. The comparison between them shows the displayed stability estimate, with its common hypotheses written below.

Drawing labels and data 4 labels

Read the original labels as selectable text. Tables preserve grid relationships; other short labels are grouped compactly.

\(B=1\), \(D=2\)
\(\Sigma(3)=1\)

\(\widetilde B=9/8\), \(\widetilde D=17/8\)
\(\widetilde\Sigma(3)=81/56\)

  • \(25/56\leq21/32\)
  • common hypotheses: \(g=9/8\), \(\delta=3/4\)

Open the full-size drawing

A stability estimate with a common spectral gap

Compare \((B,D)=(1,2)\) with \((\widetilde B,\widetilde D)=(9/8,17/8)\) at \(z=3\). Both hidden spectral distances are at least \(\delta=3/4\), and both couplings are bounded by \(g=9/8\). Then

\[ |\Sigma-\widetilde\Sigma|=\left|1-\frac{81}{56}\right|=\frac{25}{56}, \qquad \frac{2g}{\delta}|B-\widetilde B| +\frac{g^2}{\delta^2}|D-\widetilde D|=\frac{21}{32}. \]

The theorem bounds the difference using a common spectral gap. Applying the bound uniformly to a refinement family requires uniform spectral separation and control of the couplings.

A series near zero energy and its exact remainder

At \(z=1/2\), \(|z|\,|D^{-1}|=1/4<1\), so

\[ \Sigma(z)=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{z^n}{2^{n+1}}. \]

After the first four terms, the exact remainder has magnitude \(1/384\). The geometric series controls the infinite tail. The retained check verifies that remainder, the complex sign identity, and the identities for the projected resolvent and bare truncation at four specified real spectral parameters.

At \(z=2\) the hidden inverse fails. At an eigenvalue of the full Hamiltonian, the retained Feshbach inverse fails. Neither point belongs to the resolvent identity's domain. Analytic continuation of a scalar expression does not erase its theorem hypotheses.

Read this as

A uniform effective response requires a uniform gap and coupling bound. Exact small examples show how those hypotheses enter each estimate.

Source and conversion record

The original atlas wording, equations, and drawing labels are retained. Drawings are views of the frozen monograph PDF. Text descriptions and table headings are added reading aids. This conversion does not rebuild TeX, rerun the examples, audit proofs or compile Lean.

Conversion checks and source hashes

Notation in Paper VII

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index