Paper IV visual guide · Visual 11 of 26 · NEWTON AND ADDITION

Two recurrences reach the same answer

Traditional monograph: Theorem 7.3 (p. 14), Theorem 7.4 (p. 15), Theorem 7.6 (p. 15).

Start reading

Resources & source

Original plate in the PDF

Evidence notes retain the source edition’s scope. Read the evidence guide.

Skip contents and start reading

One recurrence uses the denominator coefficients. Another uses its logarithm. With \(b_n(r)=P_{N,n}(r)/(Nn)!\), the shorter logarithmic form is

\[ nb_n(r)=r\sum_{k=1}^{n}\kappa_{N,k}b_{n-k}(r),\qquad b_0=1. \]

The negative superdiagonal in the Newton determinant is essential.

A Newton determinant and four block-convolution contributions give the same reciprocal coefficient.
Original drawing. Read the description below; expand the labels and data for selectable text.

Reading the drawing

The left panel shows a three-by-three determinant with a negative superdiagonal. Its normalization is stated immediately below. The right panel has four contributions, indexed from zero to three, to the parameter-addition calculation. The middle contributions use the larger block binomial weights rather than ordinary binomial weights.

Drawing labels and data 21 labels

Read the original labels as selectable text. Tables preserve grid relationships; other short labels are grouped compactly.

\(n!b_n(r)\) for \(n=3\)
Row / columnColumn 0Column 1Column 2
Row 0\(\frac{r}{2}\)\(-1\)\(0\)
Row 1\(\frac{r}{6}\)\(\frac{r}{2}\)\(-2\)
Row 2\(\frac{r}{15}\)\(\frac{r}{6}\)\(\frac{r}{2}\)
  • \(\det /6=P_{2,3}(r)/720\)
Parameter-addition contributions
Block indexContribution
\(q=0\)61
\(q=1\)75
\(q=2\)75
\(q=3\)61
  • \(P_{2,3}(2)=61+75+75+61=272\)
  • block weights: \(1,15,15,1\)

Open the full-size drawing

The additive parameter law has block weights

Using the same logarithm, \(D_N^{-r}D_N^{-s}=D_N^{-(r+s)}\). Thus

\[ P_{N,n}(r+s)=\sum_{q=0}^{n}\binom{Nn}{Nq}P_{N,q}(r)P_{N,n-q}(s). \]

For \(N=2,n=3,r=s=1\), the four weights are \(1,15,15,1\). The two middle terms are \(15\cdot1\cdot5\) and \(15\cdot5\cdot1\). Together with the endpoints, they give \(272\). Using \(\binom nq\) instead would be incorrect for these coefficients. That ordinary binomial law belongs to the separately normalized sequence \(n!P_{N,n}/(Nn)!\).

Read this as

Agreement of independent recurrences is a useful check precisely because their bookkeeping is different. Neither permits silently changing the factorial convention.

Evidence note from the source edition

The checker compares both recurrence routes and the determinant, then checks the parameter-addition identity symbolically. A deliberately incorrect ordinary-binomial substitution is rejected.

Source and conversion record

The editable source, drawings and PDF are matched to this edition. Text descriptions and table headings are reading aids. Recorded mathematical and formal checks retain their stated dates and scope.

Editable atlas source · Conversion checks

Notation in Paper IV

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index