Paper VReading edition

Polyphase coordinates on finite index sublattices

Reading tools
Reading libraryFind statementsInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Original TeX with line links · Download TeX

The wording and mathematics follow the retained manuscript. This reading format does not add a proof review or extend Lean coverage.

Skip contents and start reading

E3 Polyphase coordinates on finite index sublattices

Let \(L\leq{\mathbb Z}^d\) be a sublattice of finite index \(q\). Choose a set \(R\subset{\mathbb Z}^d\) containing one representative from every coset in \({\mathbb Z}^d/L\). Thus

\[ {\mathbb Z}^d=\bigsqcup_{r\in R}(r+L). \]

For \(x:{\mathbb Z}^d\to{\mathbb C}\), its channel at \(r\) is the sequence on \(L\)

\[ x_r(\ell)=x(r+\ell). \]

Definition E3.1: Lattice packet

For \(r\in R\), define the coordinate projector

\[ (P_rx)(n)={\mathbf 1}_{r+L}(n)x(n). \]

The family \((P_r)_{r\in R}\) is called the packet system associated with \(L\) and \(R\).

For finite \(p\), equip \(\bigoplus_{r\in R}\ell^p(L)\) with

\[ \|(u_r)\|^p=\sum_{r\in R}\|u_r\|_p^p. \]

For \(p=\infty\), use the maximum norm.

Theorem E3.2: Exact lattice polyphase decomposition

For every \(1\leq p\leq\infty\), the analysis map

\[ {\mathcal A}_L:\ell^p({\mathbb Z}^d)\longrightarrow\bigoplus_{r\in R}\ell^p(L), \qquad {\mathcal A}_Lx=(x_r)_{r\in R}, \]

is an isometric isomorphism. Its inverse is the interleaving map

\[ {\mathcal S}_L(u)(r+\ell)=u_r(\ell). \]

The projectors satisfy

\[ P_rP_s=\delta_{rs}P_r, \qquad \sum_{r\in R}P_r=I. \]

Proof of Theorem E3.2

Every address has a unique representation \(r+\ell\). For finite \(p\),

\[ \|x\|_p^p = \sum_{r\in R}\sum_{\ell\in L}|x(r+\ell)|^p = \sum_{r\in R}\|x_r\|_p^p. \]

The corresponding supremum identity is immediate when \(p=\infty\). Unique address representation proves that analysis and interleaving are inverse maps. The projector identities follow from the disjoint coset partition.

Corollary E3.3: One dimensional residue coordinates

For \(L=N{\mathbb Z}\) and \(R=\{0,\ldots,N-1\}\),

\[ x_r(k)=x(Nk+r) \]

and

\[ \ell^p({\mathbb Z})\cong\bigoplus_{r=0}^{N-1}\ell^p({\mathbb Z}) \]

isometrically.

Proof of Corollary E3.3

Apply Theorem E3.2 to the standard residue representatives.

Proposition E3.4: Translation covariance

Fix \(a\in{\mathbb Z}^d\). For every \(r\in R\), write uniquely

\[ r-a=r_a+\lambda_{a,r}, \qquad r_a\in R, \quad \lambda_{a,r}\in L. \]

Then

\[ ({\mathcal A}_LT_ax)_r(\ell) = x_{r_a}(\ell+\lambda_{a,r}). \]

Thus a fine translation permutes the lattice packets and applies an internal translation on \(L\).

Proof of Proposition E3.4

Evaluate at \(r+\ell\):

\[ (T_ax)(r+\ell) =x(r+\ell-a) =x(r_a+\ell+\lambda_{a,r}). \]

This is the stated channel formula.

A signal and its four residue channels, which interleave exactly.
A signal and its four exact residue channels. Interleaving the channels returns the original samples without approximation.

View full-size figure (new tab)

E3.1 Refinement of sublattices

Let \(L'\leq L\leq{\mathbb Z}^d\), with both indices finite. Choose representative systems \(R\) for \({\mathbb Z}^d/L\) and \(R'\) for \({\mathbb Z}^d/L'\). For \(r\in R\), define

\[ \operatorname{Child}(r) = \{s\in R':s+L'\subset r+L\}. \]

Theorem E3.5: Exact lattice refinement

For every coarse packet,

\[ P_r^{L} = \sum_{s\in\operatorname{Child}(r)}P_s^{L'}. \]

The fine packets in the sum are pairwise disjoint. Refinement through several nested sublattices is transitive.

Proof of Theorem E3.5

The coset \(r+L\) is the disjoint union of the \(L'\) cosets contained in it. Multiplying by the corresponding indicator functions gives the projector identity. A nested partition of a coset is independent of whether the intermediate level is inserted, which proves transitivity.

Example E3.6: Rectangular image phases

For

\[ L=M{\mathbb Z}\times N{\mathbb Z}\subset{\mathbb Z}^2, \]

one may take

\[ R=\{0,\ldots,M-1\}\times\{0,\ldots,N-1\}. \]

The analysis map separates an image into \(MN\) exact phases. Refining \((M,N)\) to \((M',N')\), where \(M\mid M'\) and \(N\mid N'\), splits every coarse phase into

\[ \frac{M'}M\frac{N'}N \]

fine phases.

Source and conversion record

Source SHA-256: 5d3c6b2e5709c37ea551eb8fd1d823e5249c5fbc411d36b806241af4df888f36

Unsupported prose commands stop the build. The mathematical expression sequence is checked against the source, with manuscript macros expanded for display.

Conversion records

Notation in Paper V

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index