Special FunctionsReading edition

Multiple-prime geometry

Reading tools
Reading libraryInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Read and explore

Proofs and implementation

About this work

Other resources

Original TeX with line links

Skip contents and start reading

Overlap is part of the arithmetic

For a finite set \(F\) of distinct primes, define

\[ \nu_{F,\boldsymbol\lambda} =\sum_{n\ge1}\mu(n)^2n^{-4} \prod_{p\in F}(1+\lambda_p\mathbf1_{p\mid n})\delta_{x_n}, \quad x_n=(1-n^{-2})^2. \]

For real strengths, the exact positivity domain is

\[ \boxed{\lambda_p\ge-1\quad\text{for every }p\in F.} \]

Sufficiency is termwise positivity. If one strength is below \(-1\), the atom \(n=p\) isolates its negative factor. The other strengths do not occur at that atom. At every simultaneous deletion endpoint, primes outside \(F\) still supply infinitely many positive nodes, so all Hankel matrices remain strictly positive definite.

The exact coordinate formula is

\[ M_j(\boldsymbol\lambda)=\sum_{r=0}^{2j}(-1)^r\binom{2j}{r} \frac{\zeta(4+2r)}{\zeta(8+4r)} \prod_{p\in F}\left(1+\frac{\lambda_p}{p^{4+2r}+1}\right). \]

Coefficients of the monic families lie in \(\mathbb Q(\pi^{-2},\lambda_p:p\in F)\). For two primes, the overlap term is visible:

\[ M_j=M_j(0,0)+\lambda_pU_{p,j}+\lambda_qU_{q,j} +\lambda_p\lambda_qU_{pq,j}. \]

Here \(U_{pq,j}>0\) is the \(pq\)-divisible submeasure moment. The family does not reduce to adding separate prime responses without their overlap.

Moment positivity is a weaker requirement

The exact positive-measure domain and the order-one moment test have different parameter geometry. Regions passing a finite test outside the safe orthant still contain negative atoms.
The exact positive-measure domain and the order-one moment test have different parameter geometry. Regions passing a finite test outside the safe orthant still contain negative atoms.

View full-size figure (new tab)

For primes two and three,

\[ M_0=105\pi^{-4}(1+\lambda_2/17)(1+\lambda_3/82). \]

Both \((0,0)\) and \((-34,-164)\) have positive total mass. Their midpoint \((-17,-82)\) has zero mass. Thus the parameter set passing the order-one positive-definiteness test is nonconvex. This particular midpoint argument does not establish nonconvexity of the semidefinite test, which permits zero. For that test, take the two points \((0,0)\) and \((-34,-246)\). The normalized masses \(M_0/(105\pi^{-4})\) there are \(1\) and \(2\). Their convex combination with weights \(3/5\) and \(2/5\) is \((-68/5,-492/5)\), where the normalized mass is \(-1/25\). Thus the order-one semidefinite feasible set is also nonconvex, by a separate counterexample.

A separate additive family has different geometry

For weights \(1+\sum_{p\in F}\gamma_p\mathbf1_{p\mid n}\), positivity is equivalent to

\[ 1+\sum_{\gamma_p<0}\gamma_p\ge0. \]

Every prime subset appears at its squarefree product, proving necessity. Checking each atom proves sufficiency. Its finite Hankel matrices are affine in \(\gamma\), so the semidefinite feasible sets are convex spectrahedra. The multiplicative family has genuine overlap terms and polynomial parameter dependence. These are two distinct deformations, with distinct domains.

Every negative prime atom has a finite detector

For an integer \(a\ge2\), let

\[ L_a(x)=\prod_{n=1}^{a-1}\frac{x-x_n}{x_a-x_n},\quad C_a=L_a(1),\quad r_a=\frac{1-x_{a+1}}{1-x_a}<1, \]
\[ f_{a,m}(x)=L_a(x)\left(\frac{1-x}{1-x_a}\right)^m. \]

This polynomial kills every lower node, equals one at \(x_a\), and has absolute value at most \(C_ar_a^m\) at every higher node.

A rational detector for p=3, lambda 3=-1.1, lambda 2=1. The first exact bound proving negativity is m=5, so a Hankel matrix of order eight detects the signed defect.
A rational detector for \(p=3\), \(\lambda_3=-1.1\), \(\lambda_2=1\). The first exact bound proving negativity is \(m=5\), so a Hankel matrix of order eight detects the signed defect.

View full-size figure (new tab)

Set \(C_F=\prod_{q\in F}\max(1,|1+\lambda_q|)\). The summable tail gives

\[ \int f_{p,m}^2{\,d}\nu \le\frac{1+\lambda_p}{p^4}+ \frac{C_FC_p^2}{3p^3}r_p^{2m}. \]

Hence the quadratic form is negative whenever \(pC_FC_p^2r_p^{2m}/3<-(1+\lambda_p)\). For rational strengths this is an exact rational certificate. It needs no numerical eigenvalue calculation. A depth tilt \(x^k\) replaces the negative atom contribution by \((1+\lambda_p)x_p^k/p^4\).

Real singularities survive multiple deletions

Fix all strengths except \(\lambda_p\), with the others at least \(-1\). The remaining moment matrix has the form \(A_m+(1+\lambda_p)B_m\), where \(A_m\) is the \(p\)-free part and \(B_m\) the \(p\)-divisible part. Both are positive definite, even at other deletion endpoints: primes outside \(F\) supply the first support, and integers \(p\ell\) the second.

Thus every one-variable determinant fiber has exact degree \(m\) and all roots real below \(-1\). Its nearest margin satisfies

\[ \delta_m=\min_{\substack{f\in\mathbb R[x]\setminus\{0\}\\\deg f<m}} \frac{\int f^2{\,d}\nu_{p\text{-free}}} {\int f^2{\,d}\nu_{p\text{-divisible}}},\qquad\delta_m\downarrow0. \]

The detector yields, for \(C_\kappa=\prod_{q\ne p}\max(1,1+\lambda_q)\),

\[ \delta_{p+m}\le\frac{pC_\kappa C_p^2}{3}r_p^{2m}. \]

The denominator retains the atom \(p\); all lower nodes in the numerator are killed. This extends the prime-two bound to every prime and to simultaneous positive or deletion strengths. It does not assert simple roots or global multivariate real stability.

If at least two positive-domain strengths are nonzero, the complete monic sequence cannot equal a one-prime sequence on the same variable and nodes. Compact moment determinacy equates normalized measures; the fixed mass at zero fixes their scale; atom weights at the individual primes then read off every strength. An arbitrary affine change of variable is outside this separator.

Source and conversion record

This HTML edition follows the retained manuscript. It adds no proof review or Lean coverage.

Source identities and equation checks

Notation in Special Functions

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index