Special FunctionsReading edition

Coupled-family release record

Reading tools
Reading libraryInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Read and explore

Proofs and implementation

About this work

Other resources

Original TeX with line links

Skip contents and start reading

What the coupled extension establishes

ResultScope
Coupled entire constructionUnique normalized pair for four positive strict contractions, with positive odd coefficients
Common growth lawExact order from the characteristic matrix, positive lower type, finite upper type, and exact Perron proportions for both type vectors
Component reductionRescaling occurs exactly on \(q=b\) or \(qb=ar\)
Generic exact inverseCoefficients through degree seven identify all four ordered scales when \(D\ne0\)
Operator obstructionNo invertible constant linear change decouples the defining operator on all analytic inputs
Resolution certificatesExplicit compact, radius, prime-depth and polynomial-degree bounds for the three worked examples
Verification and reproducibility

The archived coupled-system run records 5,272 exact assertions and 26 numerical assertions. Thirteen input and resource guards are recorded separately. The exact inverse is checked on 256 rational parameter tuples. The coupled API is compared with an independent dense Picard construction and classical anchors. The resolution checks verify the exact rational certificates. These counts are separate from the earlier four-family evidence of 19,871 exact and 5,576 numerical assertions.

The preserved coupled-family review reconstructs the proof implications and the source files. It corrected an initial-segment quantifier in the detector theorem. The worked certificate already used that initial segment. The source package records the correction, the repair of a figure label, and the successful checks.

Questions that remain open

The coupled theorem does not determine an ordinary type limit, uniform angular growth, or the complex zero geometry. Stable finite-precision recovery near the reduction surfaces remains open. The resolution bounds are constructive and can be conservative. The sieve example leaves degrees five and six undecided. The literature comparison does not settle historical priority.

The exact API and its checks run with the Python standard library. NumPy, Matplotlib, and mpmath generate the figures. The full manuscript supplies the proof appendices and the source archive contains the code and inputs needed for the computations.

Source and conversion record

This HTML edition follows the retained manuscript. It adds no proof review or Lean coverage.

Source identities and equation checks

Notation in Special Functions

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index