Paper XIIReading edition

Auxiliary group algebras and augmentation

Reading tools
Reading libraryFind statementsInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Original TeX with line links · Download TeX

The wording and mathematics follow the retained manuscript. This reading format does not add a proof review or extend Lean coverage.

Skip contents and start reading

5 Auxiliary group algebras and augmentation

Let \(\Delta\) be a finite abelian \(p\) group and let

\[ \Lambda={\mathcal O}[\Delta]. \]

The augmentation map is

\[ \epsilon:\Lambda\longrightarrow{\mathcal O}, \qquad \sum_{g\in\Delta}a_gg\longmapsto\sum_{g\in\Delta}a_g. \]

Its kernel is the augmentation ideal \({\mathfrak a}\).

Proposition 5.1: Functorial group algebra transfer

A group homomorphism \(q:\Delta'\to\Delta\) induces an \({\mathcal O}\) algebra homomorphism

\[ q_*:{\mathcal O}[\Delta']\longrightarrow{\mathcal O}[\Delta]. \]

If \(q\) is surjective, then \(q_*\) is surjective. Augmentation commutes with the transfer:

\[ \epsilon_\Delta q_*=\epsilon_{\Delta'}. \]

Proof of Proposition 5.1

Extend \(q\) linearly from the group basis. Multiplicativity follows from \(q(gh)=q(g)q(h)\). Surjectivity follows because every basis element of \({\mathcal O}[\Delta]\) has a preimage. Both augmentation maps send every group element to one, which gives the final identity.

Theorem 5.2: Residual augmentation algebra

Suppose

\[ \Delta\cong \prod_{i=1}^{r}C_{p^{n_i}}. \]

Choose generators \(\gamma_i\), and let \(X_i=\gamma_i-1\). Then

\[ \boxed{ k[\Delta] \cong k[X_1,\ldots,X_r] \big/ (X_1^{p^{n_1}},\ldots,X_r^{p^{n_r}}). } \]

The augmentation ideal is generated by the \(X_i\), and \(k[\Delta]\) is local.

Proof of Theorem 5.2

In characteristic \(p\),

\[ (1+X_i)^{p^{n_i}}-1=X_i^{p^{n_i}}. \]

Thus the assignment \(X_i\mapsto\gamma_i-1\) gives a surjective homomorphism from the displayed truncated polynomial ring to \(k[\Delta]\). Both sides have dimension \(\prod_ip^{n_i}={\left\lvert\Delta\right\rvert}\) over \(k\), so the map is an isomorphism. The quotient by the ideal generated by the \(X_i\) is \(k\). Since each \(X_i\) is nilpotent, that ideal is the unique maximal ideal.

Corollary 5.3: No residual character splitting

The residual group algebra \(k[\Delta]\) has no nontrivial idempotents. In particular, character projectors do not split a finite \(p\) group algebra in residue characteristic \(p\).

Proof of Corollary 5.3

The first assertion follows from locality in Theorem 5.2. For the general finite \(p\) group assertion, let \(e\in k[G]\) be idempotent and write \(\epsilon:k[G]\to k\) for augmentation. Suppose \(\epsilon(e)=0\) and \(e\ne0\). The \({\mathbb F}_p\) span \(W\) of the left translates \(ge\) is a nonzero finite dimensional \({\mathbb F}_p\) vector space, stable under \(G\). Its cardinality is divisible by \(p\). The orbit counting formula implies that its fixed point set also has cardinality divisible by \(p\). Since zero is fixed, there is a nonzero fixed vector \(v\in W\).

A vector in the regular representation fixed by all left translations has constant coefficients. Consequently \(ve=\epsilon(e)v=0\). On the other hand, \(e^2=e\) implies \(we=w\) for every \(w\in W\), hence \(ve=v\), a contradiction. Thus every idempotent of augmentation zero is zero. Since \(\epsilon(e)^2=\epsilon(e)\) in the field \(k\), either \(\epsilon(e)=0\) or \(\epsilon(e)=1\); in the latter case apply the preceding argument to \(1-e\).

For \(M\otimes_{\Lambda,\epsilon}{\mathcal O}\), we use a right \(\Lambda\) module \(M\). The left module convention is \({\mathcal O}\otimes_{\Lambda,\epsilon}M\). Throughout, \({\mathfrak a} M\) denotes the augmentation relation submodule: it is generated by \(ma\) for right modules and by \(am\) for left modules, with \(a\in{\mathfrak a}\). This convention also applies to nonabelian groups in Corollary 11.2. For abelian groups, both tensor orders agree over the commutative group algebra.

Theorem 5.4: Coinvariant recovery

Let \(M\) be a free \(\Lambda\) module of rank \(d\). Then

\[ \boxed{ M/{\mathfrak a} M \cong M\otimes_{\Lambda,\epsilon}{\mathcal O} \cong {\mathcal O}^d. } \]

The statement is valid for every coefficient prime, including two.

Proof of Theorem 5.4

Choose a \(\Lambda\) basis of \(M\). Tensoring the resulting isomorphism \(M\cong\Lambda^d\) along augmentation gives \({\mathcal O}^d\). Tensoring by \(\Lambda/{\mathfrak a}\) is the same as quotienting by \({\mathfrak a} M\).

Standard fact 5.5: Iwasawa limit

For \(\Delta_m=({\mathbb Z}/p^m{\mathbb Z})^r\), the inverse limit of \({\mathcal O}[\Delta_m]\) is the Iwasawa algebra

\[ {\mathcal O}[[{\mathbb Z}_p^r]]\cong{\mathcal O}[[X_1,\ldots,X_r]], \]

where \(X_i\) corresponds to a chosen topological generator minus one [20].

Auxiliary group algebras refine through quotient maps, while augmentation recovers the coarse level.
Auxiliary group algebras refine through quotient maps, while augmentation recovers the coarse level.

View full-size figure (new tab)

The residual auxiliary algebra is a local truncated polynomial algebra at every coefficient prime.
The residual auxiliary algebra is a local truncated polynomial algebra at every coefficient prime.

View full-size figure (new tab)

The augmentation formalism is uniform in \(p\). The difficult coefficient two questions lie elsewhere. Residual image hypotheses, local deformation geometry, and classicality may change at two even though coinvariant recovery remains exact.

Source and conversion record

Source SHA-256: f5137c0fffed58acc1590165c77a75848e4d97671dca9caafb7c147e6aa1112a

Unsupported prose commands stop the build. The mathematical expression sequence is checked against the source, with manuscript macros expanded for display.

Conversion records

Notation in Paper XII

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index