5 Factorial precision at section order four
On this page · Permalink · Source line 249
Write \(C_j=C_{4,j}\) and \(F_j=F_{4,j}\). The all-row theorem removes the threshold, but at \(N=4\) it leaves a further factorial gain unused. The exact algebra below proves that gain for all four addresses and identifies several infinite families where it is sharp.
Theorem 5.1: Four-address factorial bound
For \(j\in\{0,1,2,3\}\), \(n\geq0\), \(k\geq1\), and positive mixed steps,
Address two also satisfies
For the original coefficients, the offsets in (5.1) are \((0,0,4,2)\). No positive-order offset is asserted for the empty difference.
Visual guide: The final rank-four congruence · Visual guide: Why address two has a different slope · Permalink · Source line 257 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
The proof of the first two addresses uses one classical arithmetic input: Frobenius's exact congruence for the ordinary Euler numbers in the \(\operatorname{sech}\) convention, as stated and derived by Gessel [gessel], Section 9. The address-two and address-three bounds below are finite Bernoulli calculations and do not require that input. A divided-power argument is necessary: ordinary integral moments alone do not justify division by \(k!\).
5.1 Euler moments and an integral divided-power algebra
On this page · Permalink · Source line 286
Let \(\mathcal L\) be the ordinary Euler evaluation functional on a variable \(\mathcal E\), defined by
The functional is linear; it is not a multiplicative evaluation. Independent variables mean that moments of polynomials in separate variables factor. Odd moments vanish. Frobenius's congruence is
For \(m=0\), the assertion is that every even Euler number is odd. With \(P=(\mathcal E^2-1)/2\) and \(\gamma_m(P)=P^m/m!\), the case \(n=0\) says
Introduce an independent Euler variable \(\mathcal F\) and \(Q=(\mathcal F^2-1)/2\).
Put \(K=\mathbb Q_2(i)\), \(R=\mathbb Z_2[i]\), \(a=(1+i)/2\), and \(b=(1-i)/2\). The exact identity
gives, for \(U=a\mathcal E+b\mathcal F\), \(\mathcal L(U^{4n})=C_0(n)\). Although \(a\) and \(b\) have negative valuation, their denominators disappear from the following exact polynomial identities:
Let \(\Gamma_R(P,Q)\) be the \(R\)-subalgebra generated by all \(\gamma_m(P)\) and \(\gamma_r(Q)\). Adjoin \(\mathcal E,\mathcal F\) with
and call the resulting algebra \(\mathcal A_0\). Its elements are finite expressions; no completion is being presumed. It is generated as a \(\Gamma_R(P,Q)\)-module by \(1,\mathcal E,\mathcal F,\mathcal E\mathcal F\). The functional maps this module to \(R\). For an even basis term this is (5.4) and independence. For a basis term with an odd Euler factor the moment is zero, since \(P\) and \(Q\) are even polynomials in their respective variables.
Every displayed component of \(H_0\) has all its divided powers in \(\mathcal A_0\). Besides the generators, the needed identities are
The first scalar counts partitions into pairs and is an integer. For the last term of \(H_0\), multiply the third identity by \((i\mathcal E\mathcal F)^m\) and reduce the Euler powers using the integral quadratic relations. Finally,
proves \(\gamma_k(H_0)\in\mathcal A_0\). Applying the functional and putting \(W=U^4-1=2H_0\) gives
These moments are rational. The identity \(R\cap\mathbb Q_2=\mathbb Z_2\), obtained from the linear independence of \(1,i\) over \(\mathbb Q_2\), descends every such divisibility statement to \(\mathbb Z_2\). No field property of \(R/2R\) is needed.
For every starting row,
Each summand lies in \(2^k k!\mathbb Z_2\), proving the factorial bound for address zero from row zero onward.
5.2 A finite step-expansion lemma
On this page · Permalink · Source line 385
The conversion from unit steps to arbitrary mixed steps is used several times, so it is useful to make it explicit. Write \(\Delta=\Delta_1\). For \(H>0\),
A mixed term with local orders \(m_1,\ldots,m_k\geq1\) and \(M=\sum_\nu m_\nu\) therefore has valuation at least
if the unit-order estimate has offset \(\beta\) for every positive order. The inequalities
make this at least \(k+v_2(k!)+\beta+\sum_\nu v_2(H_\nu)\). Every expansion is finite. This proves the desired mixed-step transfer without an exchange of limits.
5.3 An elementary Bernoulli denominator bound
On this page · Permalink · Source line 409
Let \(B_m\) denote the Bernoulli numbers with \(B_1=-1/2\). The identity obtained by substituting \(u=e^t-1\) into \(\log(1+u)/u\) is
where the braces are Stirling numbers of the second kind. Each \(2r!/(r+1)\) is dyadically integral. Indeed, if \(s=v_2(r+1)>0\), then \(r\geq2^s-1\) and
The last inequality is \(2^s\geq2s\); the case \(s=0\) is immediate. Consequently
Thus the transfer factors below require no appeal to the von Staudt–Clausen theorem.
5.4 Address one and the scaled-binomial transfer
On this page · Permalink · Source line 434
The address-one source is \(G_{4,1}(t)=(\sinh t+\sin t)/(2t)\). The identities \(a+b=1\), \(a-b=i\), and \(ab=1/2\) give
For example, its numerator follows from
while \(\cosh t+\cos t=2\cosh(at)\cosh(bt)\). Only degrees divisible by four survive. Its actual Hurwitz packets are
The constant is one. Since \(v_2(4i+2)=1\), the elementary Bernoulli bound shows \(v_2(d_i)\geq2i\). Hurwitz inversion therefore gives
This follows by induction from the inverse recurrence: for packet index \(i\), every product \(d_rh_{i-r}\) has valuation at least \(2i\), and its binomial multiplier is integral. Because \(F_1=F_0D_1^{-1}\),
At a natural \(n\) this is a finite sum, with \(i\leq n\).
Here is the polynomial estimate that supplies one additional bit. For \(i\geq1\), put \(P_i(x)=4^i\binom{4x}{4i}\). Its constant is zero, and its degree-\(d\) coefficient is
where \(s(m,d)\) is a signed Stirling number of the first kind. In each product contributing to \(s(4i,d)\), at most \(d-1\) of the \(2i-1\) even integers in \(1,\ldots,4i-1\) can be omitted. Thus
Writing \(s_2(i)\) for the number of ones in the binary expansion of \(i\), and using \(v_2((4i)!)=4i-s_2(i)\), gives
For \(k\geq1\), \(\Delta_1^k x^d\) vanishes when \(d<k\) and is an integer polynomial with values divisible by \(k!\). To see the latter, expand \(x^d=\sum_r\left\{\begin{smallmatrix}d\\r\end{smallmatrix}\right\} r!\binom xr\) and apply \(\Delta_1^k\binom xr=\binom{x}{r-k}\). It follows that
For \(k=0\) the bound follows directly from the coefficient estimate.
To apply discrete products in (5.15) without a moving truncation, first extend \(C_0\) to \(\mathbb Z_2\) by its uniformly convergent Newton series. The all-row bound \(v_2(\Delta_1^m C_0(0))\geq m\) proves this convergence. Its factorial bounds extend to every dyadic starting point by continuity and approximation with natural rows. The sum in (5.15) is then uniformly convergent on \(\mathbb Z_2\): both the binomial polynomial and \(C_0(x-i)\) are integral-valued and \(v_2(h_i)\geq2i\).
For the pointwise product \(P_i(x)C_0(x-i)\), the discrete Leibniz formula has scalar divisibility
Multiplication by \(h_i/4^i\in\mathbb Z_2\) and uniform summation now give
The same extra bit holds for positive mixed steps by (5.10). Combining this with the address-zero bound proves Theorem 5.1 for address one.
5.5 Central factorials and integral Bernoulli divided powers
On this page · Permalink · Source line 534
Lemma 5.2: Bernoulli divided-power moments
Let \(Z\) be the ordinary Bernoulli variable, \(\mathcal L(Z^r)=B_r\), with exponential transform \(t/(e^t-1)\). For \(P=Z(Z+1)\) and \(\mu_m=\mathcal L(P^m/m!)\),
Moreover, \(\mu_m\) is odd exactly when \(m=0\) or \(m\) is a positive power of two.
Read proof · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 536 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Proof of Lemma 5.2
Define the central-factorial basis polynomials
At \(X=Z(Z+1)\), they have the exact factorization
The Bernoulli transform gives \(\mathcal L((1+T)^Z)=\log(1+T)/T\), whence \(\mathcal L(\binom Zj)=(-1)^j/(j+1)\). Finite Vandermonde expansion therefore gives
The last equality is the rational identity obtained by expanding \(\int_0^1t^r(1-t)^r\,dt\). This use of an ordinary finite integral makes no assertion about a positive or bounded \(p\)-adic measure. In particular,
Expand \(X^m=\sum_{r=0}^mT(m,r)P_r(X)\). Since \(XP_r(X)=P_{r+1}(X)+r(r+1)P_r(X)\), these integer coefficients satisfy
Every \(r(r+1)\) is even. Induction, including the boundary indices, proves \(2^{m-r}\mid T(m,r)\) for \(0\leq r\leq m\). For \(m>0\) the \(r=0\) term vanishes. Each remaining summand of \(\mathcal L(P^m/m!)\) has valuation at least
Here \(r\geq2s_2(r)-1\) follows from \(r\geq2^{s_2(r)}-1\) and \(2^u\geq2u\) for \(u\geq1\). This proves integrality and the stronger bound.
If \(m\) is not a power of two, \(s_2(m)\geq2\) makes \(\mu_m\) even. If \(m\) is a positive power of two, the only central indices which can contribute an odd residue are \(r=1\) and \(r=3\), since \(r-2s_2(r)=-1\) only at these two positive integers. The \(r=1\) term is odd: \(T(m,1)=2^{m-1}\) and \(v_2(m!)=m-1\). For \(m\geq4\) a power of two, the \(r=3\) term is even. More explicitly,
Reduction modulo two gives \((1-t)^{-2}\), whose degree \(m-3\) coefficient has parity \(m-2=0\). At \(m=1,2\) the \(r=3\) term is absent, and the \(r=1\) term is again odd. Finally \(\mu_0=1\).
Back to statement · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 550 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
5.6 Address two and its stronger filtration
On this page · Permalink · Source line 617
The variable \(\mathcal B=2Z+1\) has transform
Its odd moments vanish, and \(P=(\mathcal B^2-1)/4=Z(Z+1)\) has the divided-power moments of Lemma 5.2. Introduce an independent copy \(\mathcal D\) and \(Q=(\mathcal D^2-1)/4\). The exact factorization
shows that \(U=a\mathcal B+b\mathcal D\) satisfies \(\mathcal L(U^{4n})=C_2(n)\). Direct expansion gives
Let \(\mathcal A_2\) be the divided-power algebra over \(R\) generated by \(P,Q\), adjoining \(\mathcal B,\mathcal D\) with \(\mathcal B^2=1+4P\), \(\mathcal D^2=1+4Q\). The functional is integral on its module basis \(1,\mathcal B,\mathcal D,\mathcal B\mathcal D\) by the Bernoulli lemma, independence, and vanishing of odd moments. Every component in (5.26) has integral divided powers, by the same finite identities as before; \(P^2\) is even easier than \(P^2/2\). Consequently
The starting-row conclusion follows from the finite base expansion (5.9), now with \(W=4H_2\).
The low Newton coefficients of the actual reciprocal are
where \(a_m=\Delta_1^m C_2(0)\). Thus \(v_2(a_1)=4\) and \(v_2(a_2)=6\). For \(m\geq3\), (5.27) bounds \(a_m\) by \(2m+v_2(m!)\). The finite shifted Newton formula
therefore gives \(v_2(\Delta_1^kC_2(n))\geq k+v_2(k!)+3\) for every \(k\geq1\). For \(k\geq3\) this is \(2k\geq k+3\); for \(k=1,2\) it uses the exact initial coefficients and the higher tail bound. The finite step expansion proves the offset three in (5.1).
There is a still stronger filtration. Put
Then the exact identities are
Every divided power of \(G\) is integral component by component. The finite addition identity gives
because the \(r\)th term belongs to \(2^{r+\lfloor(k-r)/2\rfloor}\mathcal A_2\). Applying the functional, rational descent, and the base-index expansion proves the unit-step version of (5.2). For a mixed term of total order \(M\), its lower bound exceeds the target at order \(k\) by at least
Indeed \(\sum_\nu v_2(m_\nu)\leq M-k\). This proves the stronger mixed bound. The earlier offset-three bound is retained, since it is stronger at the lowest orders.
5.7 Address three and cancellation of the apparent pole
On this page · Permalink · Source line 713
The address-three source is \(G_{4,3}(t)=3(\sinh t-\sin t)/t^3\). Addition identities give
Consequently
This expression is a power series: its two polar terms cancel because \(a^{-2}+b^{-2}=0\). Its constant is one, only degrees divisible by four survive, and the Bernoulli expansion gives
Again \(v_2(d_i)\geq2i\), and the inverse coefficients \(h_i\) have the same bound. Since \(F_3=F_2D_3^{-1}\),
The scaled-binomial argument (5.18) applies unchanged. The basic bound for \(C_2\) includes order zero; its continuous extension is available from the threshold-free theorem. Thus the shifted sums converge uniformly on \(\mathbb Z_2\), and the pointwise product rule proves
At every positive order \(C_2\) has three extra bits, so this gives the one-bit offset for \(C_3\). Finite step expansion finishes the proof of Theorem 5.1.