Paper IXReading edition

Mahler transfer and local analytic branches

Reading tools
Reading libraryFind statementsInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Original TeX with line links · Download TeX

The wording and mathematics follow the retained manuscript. This reading format does not add a proof review or extend Lean coverage.

Skip contents and start reading

D.6 Mahler transfer and local analytic branches

The finite character coordinate resolves the torsion part of a local unit. A sufficiently long arithmetic jump moves the remaining unit into a principal unit neighborhood. The coarse variable then has a convergent Mahler expansion with an explicit valuation slope.

D.6.1 Finite Mahler coordinates

For a function \(f\) on the nonnegative integers, define

\[ \Delta f(n)=f(n+1)-f(n). \]
Historical theorem D.48: Finite Mahler reconstruction

Given \(f(0),\ldots,f(N)\), put \(c_r=\Delta^rf(0)\). Then

\[ \boxed{ f(n)=\sum_{r=0}^{n}c_r\binom nr \qquad(0\leq n\leq N). } \]

For every \(s\) with \(0\leq s\leq N\),

\[ \boxed{ \Delta^sf(n) = \sum_{r=s}^{N}c_r\binom n{r-s} \qquad(0\leq n\leq N-s). } \]
Proof

Let

\[ P(x)=\sum_{r=0}^{N}c_r\binom xr. \]

Newton interpolation gives \(P(n)=f(n)\) for \(0\leq n\leq N\). Iterating

\[ \Delta\binom xr=\binom x{r-1} \]

gives

\[ \Delta^sP(n)=\sum_{r=s}^{N}c_r\binom n{r-s}. \]

When \(0\leq n\leq N-s\), every value used in \(\Delta^sf(n)\) lies among the prescribed data, so \(\Delta^sf(n)=\Delta^sP(n)\).

Historical corollary D.49: Mahler valuation ledger

If \(c_r\in{\mathbb Z_p}\) and \({v_p}(c_r)\geq w(r)\), then

\[ \boxed{ {v_p}(\Delta^sf(n)) \geq \min_{r\geq s} \left( w(r)+{v_p}\binom n{r-s} \right). } \]
Proof

Apply the nonarchimedean triangle inequality to Historical theorem D.48.

The infinite interpolation theorem states that every continuous function on \({\mathbb Z_p}\) has a unique convergent Mahler expansion [Mahler1958], [Robert2000]. We use that theorem as a standard input when the local variable is allowed to range over all of \({\mathbb Z_p}\).

D.6.2 Carmichael and Mahler transfer for unit modes

Historical standard fact D.50: Local unit decomposition

For odd \(p\), every unit has a unique factorization

\[ u=\omega(u)\langle u\rangle, \qquad \omega(u)^{p-1}=1, \qquad \langle u\rangle\in1+p\mathbb Z_p. \]

Every dyadic unit has a unique factorization

\[ u=(-1)^{\epsilon(u)}\langle u\rangle, \qquad \epsilon(u)\in\{0,1\}, \qquad \langle u\rangle\in1+4\mathbb Z_2. \]

The first factor gives the finite character address. The second factor admits logarithmic and Mahler coordinates.

For odd \(p\) and \(L\geq1\), put

\[ \Lambda_{p,L}=(p-1)p^{L-1}. \]

For \(p=2\) and \(L\geq3\), put

\[ \Lambda_{2,L}=2^{L-2}. \]

These are exponents of the unit groups modulo the declared prime powers.

Historical theorem D.51: One unit mode

Let \(u\in{\mathbb Z_p}^\times\), let \(H=\Lambda_{p,L}\), and put

\[ q_{u,L}=u^H-1\in p^L{\mathbb Z_p}. \]

For every integer address \(j\) and every \(x\in{\mathbb Z_p}\),

\[ \boxed{ u^{Hx+j} = u^j\sum_{r\geq0}q_{u,L}^{\,r}\binom xr. } \]

The \(r\)th Mahler coefficient has valuation at least \(Lr\).

Proof

Write \(u^{Hx+j}=u^j(1+q_{u,L})^x\) and use the convergent binomial series on \({\mathbb Z_p}\).

Historical example D.52: Paired principal unit expansions

At the odd prime three,

\[ 2^{2x+j} = 2^j4^x = 2^j\sum_{r\geq0}3^r\binom xr. \]

At the dyadic prime,

\[ 3^{2x+j} = 3^j9^x = 3^j\sum_{r\geq0}8^r\binom xr. \]

The formal expansions are identical. Their first local slopes are one and three because \(4-1=3\) while \(9-1=8\).

Historical corollary D.53: Basic odd and dyadic difference gains

For odd \(p\),

\[ \boxed{ \Delta_{(p-1)p^a}^{\,r}u^n = u^n\left(u^{(p-1)p^a}-1\right)^r, \qquad {v_p}\left(\Delta_{(p-1)p^a}^{\,r}u^n\right)\geq(a+1)r. } \]

For odd \(u\in\mathbb Z_2^\times\),

\[ \boxed{ \Delta_{2^{a+1}}^{\,r}u^n = u^n\left(u^{2^{a+1}}-1\right)^r, \qquad {v_2}\left(\Delta_{2^{a+1}}^{\,r}u^n\right)\geq(a+3)r. } \]
Proof

One step difference multiplies a unit mode by \(u^H-1\). Fermat reduction and lifting the exponent give the odd estimate. For odd \(u\),

\[ {v_2}\left(u^{2^{a+1}}-1\right) = {v_2}(u^2-1)+a \geq a+3. \]

D.6.3 Polynomial exponential modes

Historical theorem D.54: Polynomial exponential Mahler transfer

Let

\[ f(n)=P(n)u^n \]

with \(P\in{\mathbb Z_p}[n]\) of degree \(d\). Let \(H=\Lambda_{p,L}\), fix an address \(j\), and write

\[ Q_j(x)=P(Hx+j), \qquad y=u^H, \qquad q=y-1. \]

Then

\[ \boxed{ f(Hx+j)=\sum_{r\geq0}c_{j,r}\binom xr, } \]

where

\[ \boxed{ c_{j,r} = u^j \sum_{k=0}^{\min(d,r)} \binom rk \Delta^kQ_j(0)y^kq^{r-k}. } \]

Consequently,

\[ \boxed{ {v_p}(c_{j,r})\geq L\max(r-d,0). } \]

For \(R\geq d\), truncation at depth \(R\) is valid modulo \(p^{L(R+1-d)}\) uniformly on \({\mathbb Z_p}\).

Proof

On the polynomial factor the difference operator acts as \(q+y\Delta\). The two terms commute. Expand \((q+y\Delta)^r\) and evaluate at zero. Since \(\Delta^kQ_j=0\) for \(k>d\), every surviving term contains at least \(q^{r-d}\).

D.6.4 Matrix state systems and finite adelic synchronization

Let

\[ v_{n+1}=Cv_n, \qquad a_n=w^TC^nv_0, \]

with \(C\in M_d({\mathbb Z_p})\) invertible modulo \(p\).

Historical theorem D.55: Matrix Carmichael and Mahler transfer

Editorial hypothesis correction. The original displayed statement leaves the vectors untyped. Its integrality conclusion requires \(v_0,w\in{\mathbb Z}_p^d\), \(L\ge1\), and \(H,j,n\in{\mathbb N}\) with \(H>0\); the value at \(Hx+j\) for \(x\in{\mathbb Z}_p\) means the matrix-binomial interpolation. With \(p=3\), \(C=4\), \(L=1\), \(w=1\) and \(v_0=1/3\), one has \(\Delta_1a_0=1\), which is not in \(3{\mathbb Z}_3\). The printed claim without these restrictions is therefore not an as-written certificate. The full original proof follows under the corrected hypotheses. Assume

\[ C^H=I+p^LB \]

with \(B\in M_d({\mathbb Z_p})\). For every address \(j\) and every \(x\in{\mathbb Z_p}\),

\[ \boxed{ a_{Hx+j} = \sum_{r\geq0} p^{Lr}\binom xr w^TC^jB^rv_0. } \]

The series converges on \({\mathbb Z_p}\), and

\[ \boxed{ \Delta_H^ra_n \equiv0 \pmod {p^{Lr}}. } \]
Proof

Use

\[ C^{Hx+j}=C^j(I+p^LB)^x \]

and the matrix binomial series. One difference in the coarse variable multiplies the series by \(p^LB\).

Historical theorem D.56: Finite adelic transfer

Editorial hypothesis correction. Read this statement with \(v_0,w\in{\mathbb Z}^d\), \(H>0\) and \(j,n,r\in{\mathbb N}\), and positive integer \(L_p\). These restrictions make the integral congruences and powers well typed. Allowing \(v_0=1/3\) in the one-prime example above loses the advertised digit; invertibility of \(C\) alone does not restore it. The original proof is retained under these hypotheses. Let

\[ Q=\prod_{p\in S}p^{L_p} \]

for a finite set of primes. Let \(C\in M_d({\mathbb Z})\) be invertible modulo \(Q\), and choose \(H\) such that

\[ C^H=I+QB \]

with \(B\in M_d({\mathbb Z})\). Then for every nonnegative integer \(x\),

\[ \boxed{ a_{Hx+j} = \sum_{r=0}^{x}Q^r\binom xr w^TC^jB^rv_0. } \]

For every \(r\),

\[ \boxed{ \Delta_H^ra_n\equiv0\pmod {Q^r}. } \]
Proof

Apply the integer matrix binomial theorem and reduce at every selected prime.

Historical example D.57: A simultaneous Fibonacci jump

Let

\[ C= \begin{pmatrix} 1&1\\ 1&0 \end{pmatrix}. \]

The matrix \(C\) is invertible modulo twenty four, and

\[ C^{24}-I = 24 \begin{pmatrix} 3126&1932\\ 1932&1194 \end{pmatrix}. \]

For every scalar coordinate of the state sequence \(C^nv_0\),

\[ \boxed{ \Delta_{24}^{\,r}a_n \equiv0 \pmod {24^r}. } \]

One integral jump therefore gives simultaneous congruence ladders at the primes two and three.

D.6.5 Amice pullback

Historical definition D.58: Amice pullback

For a formal exponential generating series

\[ F(z)=\sum_{n\geq0}a_n\frac{z^n}{n!}, \]

define

\[ \widehat F(T)=F(\log(1+T)). \]
Historical theorem D.59: Derivative conjugacy
\[ \boxed{ \widehat{F'}(T) = (1+T)\frac{d}{dT}\widehat F(T). } \]
Proof

Differentiate the composition \(F(\log(1+T))\).

Historical proposition D.60: Weighted convergence

If

\[ \widehat F(T)=\sum_{r\geq0}c_rT^r \]

and

\[ {v_p}(c_r)+r\alpha\longrightarrow+\infty, \]

then the series converges whenever \({v_p}(T)\geq\alpha\).

Proof

The valuation of the \(r\)th term is \({v_p}(c_r)+r{v_p}(T)\), which tends to positive infinity.

D.6.6 Odd prime depletion

For an odd prime \(p\), the source \(S_n(p)\) contains one nonunit base. Put

\[ \sigma_p=(-1)^{(p-1)/2} \]

and

\[ S_n^\times(p)=S_n(p)-\sigma_pp^n. \]
Historical theorem D.61: Depleted odd prime reconstruction

For every even \(n\),

\[ \boxed{ \left(1-\sigma_pp^n\right)E_n = \sum_{r=0}^{n/2} (-1)^rZ_{2r+1} \binom n{2r}p^{2r}S_{n-2r}^\times(p). } \]
Proof

The removed source mode contributes \(\sigma_p\cosh(pt)\). Multiplication by \(\operatorname{sech}^2(pt)\) gives \(\sigma_p\operatorname{sech}(pt)\). Subtract it from the full source and kernel product.

Fix an even address \(j\in\{0,2,\ldots,p-3\}\). For \(x\in{\mathbb Z_p}\), define

\[ \begin{aligned} \mathscr E_{p,j}^\times(x) = \sum_{r\geq0} &(-1)^rZ_{2r+1}p^{2r} \binom{(p-1)x+j}{2r}\\ &\times \sum_{\substack{0\leq a<p\\2a+1\neq p}} (-1)^a (2a+1)^{j-2r} \left((2a+1)^{p-1}\right)^x. \end{aligned} \]
Historical theorem D.62: Odd prime analytic Euler branch

The series defining \(\mathscr E_{p,j}^\times\) converges in the Tate algebra on \({\mathbb Z_p}\). For every nonnegative integer \(x\),

\[ \boxed{ \mathscr E_{p,j}^\times(x) = \left(1-\sigma_pp^{(p-1)x+j}\right) E_{(p-1)x+j}. } \]
Proof

Every retained base is a unit, and its \((p-1)\)st power lies in \(1+p{\mathbb Z_p}\). The polynomial

\[ p^{2r}\binom{(p-1)x+j}{2r} \]

has Gauss norm at most

\[ p^{-2r+{v_p}((2r)!)}. \]

This tends to zero because \(p\) is odd. The remaining factors have bounded Gauss norm. Thus the series converges in the Tate algebra. At a nonnegative integer \(x\), the binomial factor vanishes for large \(r\), and Historical theorem D.61 gives the value.

Historical remark D.63

The analytic function is defined by its unit source series. The expression \(p^{(p-1)x+j}\) in the interpolation identity is evaluated only at nonnegative integers. No analytic function \(x\mapsto p^x\) on all of \({\mathbb Z_p}\) is used.

D.6.7 Direct dyadic interpolation

For \(x\in\mathbb Z_2\), define

\[ \boxed{ \mathscr R(x) = \frac{9^{x+1}-1}{8(x+1)(2x+1)}. } \]

The apparent singularity at \(x=-1\) is removable, with value \(-\log(9)/8\).

Historical lemma D.64: Analytic dyadic source

The function \(\mathscr R\) belongs to the dyadic Tate algebra and takes values in \(\mathbb Z_2\). For every nonnegative integer \(n\),

\[ \boxed{\mathscr R(n)=R_{2n}.} \]
Proof

Put \(y=x+1\) and let \(\ell=\log 9\). Since \({v_2}(\ell)=3\),

\[ \frac{9^y-1}{8y} = \frac{\ell}{8} \sum_{m\geq0} \frac{\ell^m}{(m+1)!}y^m. \]

The coefficient of \(y^m\) has valuation

\[ 3m-{v_2}((m+1)!), \]

which is nonnegative and tends to positive infinity. The quotient therefore belongs to \(\mathbb Z_2\langle y\rangle\). The factor \(2x+1=1+2x\) is a unit in \(\mathbb Z_2\langle x\rangle\), with inverse \(\sum_{m\geq0}(-2x)^m\). Hence \(\mathscr R\) is integral and analytic. The integer values follow from the definition of \(R_{2n}\).

Define

\[ \boxed{ \mathscr E_2(x) = \sum_{r\geq0} \kappa_{2,r} \binom{2x}{2r} \mathscr R(x-r). } \]
Historical theorem D.65: Direct dyadic Euler interpolation

The series defining \(\mathscr E_2\) converges in the dyadic Tate algebra. For every nonnegative integer \(n\),

\[ \boxed{\mathscr E_2(n)=E_{2n}.} \]

Truncation after depth \(M\) is uniformly valid modulo \(2^{4M+3}\) on \(\mathbb Z_2\).

Proof

The monomial Gauss norm of \(\binom{2x}{2r}\) is at most \(2^{{v_2}((2r)!)}\). Since

\[ {v_2}(\kappa_{2,r})=4r-1, \]

the product tends to zero in Gauss norm. Translation by the integer \(r\) preserves the unit disc, so \(\mathscr R(x-r)\) remains an integral analytic function with uniformly bounded supremum norm. The series therefore converges in the Tate algebra.

At a nonnegative integer \(n\), every term with \(r>n\) vanishes and Historical theorem D.39 remains. For arbitrary \(x\in\mathbb Z_2\), the integer valued polynomial \(\binom{2x}{2r}\) and the source value \(\mathscr R(x-r)\) lie in \(\mathbb Z_2\). Every omitted term after depth \(M\) is therefore divisible by \(2^{4M+3}\). This proves the uniform truncation statement.

Historical theorem D.66: Unified local interpolation statement

The odd branch \(\mathscr E_{p,j}^\times\) and the dyadic branch \(\mathscr E_2\) are analytic local realizations of the source and kernel law in Historical theorem D.40. At integer arguments they recover, respectively,

\[ \left(1-\sigma_pp^n\right)E_n \]

on each even odd prime character branch and

\[ E_{2n} \]

on the dyadic even branch. The two realizations have distinct source corrections and distinct kernel valuation slopes.

Proof

Combine Historical theorem D.62 and Historical theorem D.65 with the source and kernel definitions in Historical theorem D.40.

Source and conversion record

Source SHA-256: 87ee9bd6c3df86066ea44a9db069d8cf75a1b673a7dffb8dfbbebb7dfe1b68c4

Unsupported prose commands stop the build. The mathematical expression sequence is checked against the source, with manuscript macros expanded for display.

Conversion records

Notation in Paper IX

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index