Paper IVReading edition

Zero zeta functions

Reading tools
Reading libraryFind statementsInspect Lean
Switch work

Saved reading

Read side by side

Start reading

Resources & source

Original TeX with line links · Download TeX

The wording and mathematics follow the retained manuscript. This reading format does not add a proof review or extend Lean coverage.

Skip contents and start reading

14 Zero zeta functions

The assumption \(N\geq2\) remains in force throughout this section. The zero counting theorem gives the exact abscissae of absolute convergence. The exponentially accurate zero locations give more. They compare the zero zeta with a Hurwitz zeta function.

Definition 14.1

Define

\[ \mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{abs}}(s) = \sum_{\rho\in{\mathcal Z}({\mathsf D}_N)}|\rho|^{-s} \]

and

\[ \mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{red}}(s) = \sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda_N}|\lambda|^{-s}, \]

with multiplicities. Each term means \(e^{-s\log|\rho|}\) or \(e^{-s\log|\lambda|}\).

Theorem 14.2: Abscissae of absolute convergence

The series \(\mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{abs}}\) converges absolutely and locally uniformly when

\[ \Re s>1. \]

It fails to converge absolutely when \(\Re s\leq1\). The series \(\mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{red}}\) converges absolutely and locally uniformly when

\[ \Re s>\frac1N. \]

It fails to converge absolutely when \(\Re s\leq1/N\). Both functions are holomorphic on their open half planes of absolute convergence.

Proof of Theorem 14.2

By Theorem 11.14, the zeros of \({\mathsf D}_N\) have linear counting density, while the reduced zeros have counting order \(R^{1/N}\). Partial summation gives absolute convergence in the stated open half planes. The positive terms obtained after taking absolute values diverge on the boundary and to its left. Local uniform convergence follows by the Weierstrass test on compact subsets.

Theorem 14.3: Meromorphic continuation of the symmetry-orbit zero zeta

Put

\[ A_N=\frac\pi{\sin(\pi/N)}. \]

There is an entire function \(Q_N^{\mathrm{red}}\) such that

\[ \mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{red}}(s) = A_N^{-Ns}\zeta\left(Ns,\frac12\right)+Q_N^{\mathrm{red}}(s) \]

on \(\Re s>1/N\). The right hand side gives a meromorphic continuation to \({\mathbb C}\) with one simple pole at \(s=1/N\). Its residue is

\[ \frac{\sin(\pi/N)}{N\pi}. \]

There is an entire function \(Q_N^{\mathrm{abs}}\) such that, initially on \(\Re s>1\),

\[ \mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{abs}}(s) = N A_N^{-s}\zeta\left(s,\frac12\right)+Q_N^{\mathrm{abs}}(s). \]

Thus \(\mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{abs}}\) continues meromorphically to \({\mathbb C}\) with one simple pole at \(s=1\), of residue

\[ \frac{N\sin(\pi/N)}\pi. \]

Proof of Theorem 14.3

For \(N=2\), Corollary 11.10 and \({\mathsf D}_2(z)=\Delta_2(z^2)\) give

\[ \lambda_m=\pi^2\left(m+\frac12\right)^2, \qquad m\geq0. \]

Thus the first formula holds with \(Q_2^{\mathrm{red}}=0\).

For \(N\geq3\), Corollary 11.13 writes all but finitely many reduced zeros as

\[ \lambda_m = \left(A_N\left(m+\frac12\right)\right)^N(1+\varepsilon_m) \]

where \(\lambda_m>0\), \(1+\varepsilon_m>0\), and

\[ \varepsilon_m = O\left(t_m^{-1}e^{-\gamma t_m}\right). \]

On every compact set of \(s\) values,

\[ (1+\varepsilon_m)^{-s}-1 = O(|\varepsilon_m|) \]

uniformly for large \(m\). The difference

\[ \lambda_m^{-s} - A_N^{-Ns}\left(m+\frac12\right)^{-Ns} \]

therefore has a normally convergent sum on every compact subset of \({\mathbb C}\). Indeed, the model power has at most polynomial growth in \(m\) on a compact set, while \(|\varepsilon_m|\) decays exponentially. The finitely many exceptional terms \(|\lambda|^{-s}\) and the finitely many omitted model terms are entire functions of \(s\). Their addition to the normally convergent tail defines \(Q_N^{\mathrm{red}}\) and proves the first formula. Thus that formula is established for every \(N\geq2\).

In either case, the Hurwitz zeta function has a meromorphic continuation with one simple pole at its first argument equal to one and residue one. Composition with \(Ns\) gives the stated pole and residue.

For every \(N\geq2\), each nonzero zero \(\lambda\) of \(\Delta_N\) gives \(N\) zeros of \({\mathsf D}_N\), each of modulus \(|\lambda|^{1/N}\). Hence

\[ \mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{abs}}(s) = N\mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{red}}(s/N). \]

Substitution gives the second formula with

\[ Q_N^{\mathrm{abs}}(s)=NQ_N^{\mathrm{red}}(s/N), \]

which is entire.

Corollary 14.4: Exact zeta models in orders two and four

For \(N=2\),

\[ \mathfrak Z_2^{\mathrm{red}}(s) = \pi^{-2s}\zeta\left(2s,\frac12\right) \]

and

\[ \mathfrak Z_2^{\mathrm{abs}}(s) = 2\pi^{-s}\zeta\left(s,\frac12\right). \]

For \(N=4\), put \(A_4=\sqrt2\pi\). Then

\[ \mathfrak Z_4^{\mathrm{red}}(s) = A_4^{-4s}\zeta\left(4s,\frac12\right) \]

and

\[ \mathfrak Z_4^{\mathrm{abs}}(s) = 4A_4^{-s}\zeta\left(s,\frac12\right). \]

In these two cases the entire correction terms in Theorem 14.3 vanish identically.

Proof of Corollary 14.4

For \(N=2\), the reduced zeros are

\[ \pi^2\left(m+\frac12\right)^2, \qquad m\geq0. \]

For \(N=4\), Example 11.12 gives the reduced zeros

\[ A_4^4\left(m+\frac12\right)^4, \qquad m\geq0. \]

Summing their negative powers proves the reduced formulas. The absolute formulas follow from

\[ \mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{abs}}(s) = N\mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{red}}(s/N). \]

Definition 14.5

Choose a logarithm for each member of the finite exceptional part of \(\Lambda_N\). Use the real logarithm for the eventual positive sequence. Define

\[ \mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{orb}}(s) = \sum_{\lambda\in\Lambda_N}e^{-s{\operatorname{Log}}\lambda}. \]

This series is initially defined on \(\Re s>1/N\).

Corollary 14.6: Branch-dependent symmetry-orbit continuation

The branch-dependent orbit zeta \(\mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{orb}}\) continues meromorphically to \({\mathbb C}\). It has the same single pole and residue as \(\mathfrak Z_N^{\mathrm{red}}\). Changing the logarithms of the finite exceptional zeros changes the continuation by an entire function.

Proof of Corollary 14.6

The tail consists of positive reduced zeros, so it has the same comparison with the Hurwitz zeta. Only finitely many terms depend on the branch choices.

Definition 14.7

Let \(q\) be a positive integer. Choose logarithms of the simple zeros of \({\mathsf D}_N\) with arguments in a fixed bounded interval. Define

\[ \mathfrak Z_{N,q}^{\mathrm{der}}(s) = \sum_{\substack{{\mathsf D}_N(\rho)=0\\ {\mathsf D}_N'(\rho)\ne0}} \frac{e^{-s{\operatorname{Log}}\rho}}{{\mathsf D}_N'(\rho)^q}. \]

Theorem 14.8: Derivative-weighted convergence

If \(N\geq3\) and \(q\geq1\), the series \(\mathfrak Z_{N,q}^{\mathrm{der}}(s)\) converges locally uniformly for every \(s\in{\mathbb C}\). It therefore defines an entire function.

For \(N=2\), the series converges absolutely and locally uniformly on \(\Re s>1\), where it defines a holomorphic function.

Proof of Theorem 14.8

For \(N\geq3\), Theorem 11.7 gives

\[ |{\mathsf D}_N'(\rho)|^{-1} \leq C e^{-c_N|\rho|} \]

for every sufficiently large simple zero. Let \(L\) be a compact subset of the \(s\) plane. Because the chosen arguments of the zeros lie in a fixed bounded interval, there are constants \(C_L\) and \(M_L\) such that

\[ \sup_{s\in L}|e^{-s{\operatorname{Log}}\rho}| \leq C_L|\rho|^{M_L} \]

for every sufficiently large zero. Hence the absolute value of the corresponding summand is at most

\[ C_L'|\rho|^{M_L}e^{-q c_N|\rho|}. \]

The linear zero counting estimate makes this majorant summable. The Weierstrass test gives absolute local uniform convergence of the series of entire summands, so its sum is entire. The finite exceptional set causes no difficulty.

For \(N=2\), the derivative of the cosine has modulus one at every zero. The assertion then follows from the linear zero spacing.

Remark 14.9

The derivative weighted sum omits the finitely many zeros that might be multiple. A treatment of those zeros requires the complete principal parts of \({\mathsf D}_N^{-q}\) rather than the single derivative weight.

Source and conversion record

Source SHA-256: cdaf548abb884706d52941c0588eb53bd3bcc886a593f2c17a596cd8a575a336

Unsupported prose commands stop the build. The mathematical expression sequence is checked against the source, with manuscript macros expanded for display.

Conversion records

Notation in Paper IV

Look up a symbol without leaving this chapter. Select text before opening help to search for it.

Search this work’s notation.

    Symbols can have different meanings in different passages. Read each result in its own context.

    Open the full notation index