Paper XI · Lean source

UnramifiedConductorZero.lean

Selected results recorded Coverage and evidence

Compiler/replay evidence is reported for a subset or bounded block. No whole-work coverage is implied.

This viewer reads the retained source; it does not run Lean or assign new claim mappings.

Local imports (2)

PaperXI/UnramifiedConductorZero.lean109 lines

Original source pathformalization/PaperXI/UnramifiedConductorZero.lean
Skip declarations and read code

Skip source text

1 import PaperXI.UnramifiedLocalFactor
2 import PaperXI.ValuationConductor
3 
4 /-! # Conductor zero for the finite unramified Weil model
5 
6 This module does two separate things.
7 
8 * It proves a generic theorem in the existing `ValuationConductor` interface:
9   a representation has Artin conductor zero when the actual degree-kernel inertia
10   subgroup is trivial.
11 * It packages the corresponding codimension/Swan/Artin exponents for the finite
12   unramified Weil model constructed in Block 39.
13 
14 The model-specific exponents are not asserted to be the conductor of an absolute
15 Weil representation. They record the exact unramified specialization of the
16 existing fixed-space formula.
17 -/
18 
19 set_option autoImplicit false
20 noncomputable section
21 
22 open scoped Classical
23 
24 namespace PaperXI.ValuationConductor
25 
26 open PaperXI.ResidueWeil PaperXI.ValuationRamification
27 
28 variable (R D : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [Group D] [MulSemiringAction D R]
29 variable {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℂ V]
30 
31 /-- In the existing lower-numbering conductor interface, a literally trivial
32 inertia subgroup forces both the Swan term and the zeroth fixed-space defect to
33 vanish. No irreducibility assumption is required. -/
34 theorem artin_zero_of_degree_kernel_bot
35     (F : RingAut (IsLocalRing.ResidueField R))
36     (ρ : Representation ℂ (Pullback (residue R D) F) V)
37     (hI : (degree (residue R D) F).ker = ⊥) :
38     artin R D F ρ = 0 := by
39   have ht : ∀ g : lower R D 1, ρ (lift R D F 1 g) = 1 := by
40     intro g
41     have hg : lift R D F 1 g ∈ (degree (residue R D) F).ker := by
42       change degree (residue R D) F (lift R D F 1 g) = 1
43       exact lift_degree R D F 1 g
44     have hbot : lift R D F 1 g ∈ (⊥ : Subgroup (Pullback (residue R D) F)) := by
45       rw [← hI]
46       exact hg
47     have he : lift R D F 1 g = 1 := by
48       simpa only [Subgroup.mem_bot] using hbot
49     simp [he]
50   have htop : fixed R D F ρ 0 = ⊤ := by
51     rw [fixed_zero]
52     exact (PaperXI.NormalInertia.fixed_top_iff_le_kernel ρ
53       (degree (residue R D) F).ker).2 (by rw [hI]; exact bot_le)
54   rw [artin, tame_swan_zero R D F ρ ht]
55   unfold codimension
56   rw [htop]
57   simp
58 
59 end PaperXI.ValuationConductor
60 
61 namespace PaperXI.FiniteUnramifiedWeil
62 
63 open PaperXI.ResidueWeil
64 open ValuativeRel
65 
66 variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [ValuativeRel K] [UniformSpace K]
67   [IsUniformAddGroup K] [IsNonarchimedeanLocalField K]
68 variable (s : Type*) [Field s] [Algebra 𝓀[K] s]
69   [FiniteDimensional 𝓀[K] s]
70 variable {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℂ V]
71 
72 /-- The fixed-space defect at inertia for the finite unramified model. -/
73 def inertiaCodimension [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
74     (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) : ℕ :=
75   Module.finrank ℂ V - Module.finrank ℂ
76     (Representation.invariants (ρ.comp (Inertia K s).subtype))
77 
78 /-- There are no positive-depth ramification contributions in the finite
79 unramified model. -/
80 def swanConductorExponent
81     (_ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) : ℝ := 0
82 
83 /-- Artin exponent in the unramified fixed-space specialization. -/
84 def artinConductorExponent [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
85     (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) : ℝ :=
86   (inertiaCodimension K s ρ : ℝ) + swanConductorExponent K s ρ
87 
88 /-- Trivial model inertia makes the inertia codimension zero. -/
89 theorem inertiaCodimension_eq_zero [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
90     (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) :
91     inertiaCodimension K s ρ = 0 := by
92   unfold inertiaCodimension
93   rw [inertia_invariants_eq_top K s ρ]
94   simp
95 
96 @[simp]
97 theorem swanConductorExponent_eq_zero
98     (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) :
99     swanConductorExponent K s ρ = 0 := rfl
100 
101 /-- Every finite-dimensional representation of the finite unramified model has
102 conductor exponent zero in this specialization. -/
103 theorem artinConductorExponent_eq_zero [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
104     (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) :
105     artinConductorExponent K s ρ = 0 := by
106   rw [artinConductorExponent, inertiaCodimension_eq_zero]
107   simp
108 
109 end PaperXI.FiniteUnramifiedWeil

Back to source controls

Original file and source record

This copy matches the recorded source file. Its publication here does not change the work’s review status.

SHA-256: 35a3f791e30467fdb145456cea233a2a85f3fc669b8cc9a5216db7b5a705f19d

Original source on GitHub

Back to Paper XI: Packets, Arithmetic Realization, and Conditional Comparison