Paper XI · Lean source
UnramifiedConductorZero.lean
Selected results recorded Coverage and evidence
Compiler/replay evidence is reported for a subset or bounded block. No whole-work coverage is implied.
This viewer reads the retained source; it does not run Lean or assign new claim mappings.
Local imports (2)
PaperXI/UnramifiedConductorZero.lean109 lines
Original source path
formalization/PaperXI/UnramifiedConductorZero.leanSkip declarations and read code
1 import PaperXI.UnramifiedLocalFactor
2 import PaperXI.ValuationConductor
3
4 /-! # Conductor zero for the finite unramified Weil model
5
6 This module does two separate things.
7
8 * It proves a generic theorem in the existing `ValuationConductor` interface:
9 a representation has Artin conductor zero when the actual degree-kernel inertia
10 subgroup is trivial.
11 * It packages the corresponding codimension/Swan/Artin exponents for the finite
12 unramified Weil model constructed in Block 39.
13
14 The model-specific exponents are not asserted to be the conductor of an absolute
15 Weil representation. They record the exact unramified specialization of the
16 existing fixed-space formula.
17 -/
18
19 set_option autoImplicit false
20 noncomputable section
21
22 open scoped Classical
23
24 namespace PaperXI.ValuationConductor
25
26 open PaperXI.ResidueWeil PaperXI.ValuationRamification
27
28 variable (R D : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [Group D] [MulSemiringAction D R]
29 variable {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℂ V]
30
31 /-- In the existing lower-numbering conductor interface, a literally trivial
32 inertia subgroup forces both the Swan term and the zeroth fixed-space defect to
33 vanish. No irreducibility assumption is required. -/
34 theorem artin_zero_of_degree_kernel_bot
35 (F : RingAut (IsLocalRing.ResidueField R))
36 (ρ : Representation ℂ (Pullback (residue R D) F) V)
37 (hI : (degree (residue R D) F).ker = ⊥) :
38 artin R D F ρ = 0 := by
39 have ht : ∀ g : lower R D 1, ρ (lift R D F 1 g) = 1 := by
40 intro g
41 have hg : lift R D F 1 g ∈ (degree (residue R D) F).ker := by
42 change degree (residue R D) F (lift R D F 1 g) = 1
43 exact lift_degree R D F 1 g
44 have hbot : lift R D F 1 g ∈ (⊥ : Subgroup (Pullback (residue R D) F)) := by
45 rw [← hI]
46 exact hg
47 have he : lift R D F 1 g = 1 := by
48 simpa only [Subgroup.mem_bot] using hbot
49 simp [he]
50 have htop : fixed R D F ρ 0 = ⊤ := by
51 rw [fixed_zero]
52 exact (PaperXI.NormalInertia.fixed_top_iff_le_kernel ρ
53 (degree (residue R D) F).ker).2 (by rw [hI]; exact bot_le)
54 rw [artin, tame_swan_zero R D F ρ ht]
55 unfold codimension
56 rw [htop]
57 simp
58
59 end PaperXI.ValuationConductor
60
61 namespace PaperXI.FiniteUnramifiedWeil
62
63 open PaperXI.ResidueWeil
64 open ValuativeRel
65
66 variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [ValuativeRel K] [UniformSpace K]
67 [IsUniformAddGroup K] [IsNonarchimedeanLocalField K]
68 variable (s : Type*) [Field s] [Algebra 𝓀[K] s]
69 [FiniteDimensional 𝓀[K] s]
70 variable {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℂ V]
71
72 /-- The fixed-space defect at inertia for the finite unramified model. -/
73 def inertiaCodimension [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
74 (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) : ℕ :=
75 Module.finrank ℂ V - Module.finrank ℂ
76 (Representation.invariants (ρ.comp (Inertia K s).subtype))
77
78 /-- There are no positive-depth ramification contributions in the finite
79 unramified model. -/
80 def swanConductorExponent
81 (_ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) : ℝ := 0
82
83 /-- Artin exponent in the unramified fixed-space specialization. -/
84 def artinConductorExponent [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
85 (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) : ℝ :=
86 (inertiaCodimension K s ρ : ℝ) + swanConductorExponent K s ρ
87
88 /-- Trivial model inertia makes the inertia codimension zero. -/
89 theorem inertiaCodimension_eq_zero [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
90 (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) :
91 inertiaCodimension K s ρ = 0 := by
92 unfold inertiaCodimension
93 rw [inertia_invariants_eq_top K s ρ]
94 simp
95
96 @[simp]
97 theorem swanConductorExponent_eq_zero
98 (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) :
99 swanConductorExponent K s ρ = 0 := rfl
100
101 /-- Every finite-dimensional representation of the finite unramified model has
102 conductor exponent zero in this specialization. -/
103 theorem artinConductorExponent_eq_zero [FiniteDimensional ℂ V]
104 (ρ : Representation ℂ (UnramifiedWeil K s) V) :
105 artinConductorExponent K s ρ = 0 := by
106 rw [artinConductorExponent, inertiaCodimension_eq_zero]
107 simp
108
109 end PaperXI.FiniteUnramifiedWeil
Original file and source record
This copy matches the recorded source file. Its publication here does not change the work’s review status.
SHA-256: 35a3f791e30467fdb145456cea233a2a85f3fc669b8cc9a5216db7b5a705f19d
Back to Paper XI: Packets, Arithmetic Realization, and Conditional Comparison