Paper XI · Lean source
OrthogonalSummands.lean
Selected results recorded Coverage and evidence
Compiler/replay evidence is reported for a subset or bounded block. No whole-work coverage is implied.
This viewer reads the retained source; it does not run Lean or assign new claim mappings.
Local imports (1)
PaperXI/OrthogonalSummands.lean120 lines
Original source path
formalization/PaperXI/OrthogonalSummands.leanSkip declarations and read code
1 import PaperXI.OddSymplectic
2 import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Basic
3 import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.LinearMap
4 import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Module
5
6 /-! Actual restricted forms and automorphisms on an internal orthogonal
7 family. Nondegeneracy is derived from orthogonality and spanning. Inverse
8 invariance is derived from finite-dimensionality and forward invariance. -/
9 set_option autoImplicit false
10 noncomputable section
11 namespace PaperXI.OrthogonalSummands
12 open scoped BigOperators
13
14 variable {K V ι : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
15
16 /-- The restriction of the actual alternating form remains alternating. -/
17 theorem restricted_isAlt (b : LinearMap.BilinForm K V) (ha : b.IsAlt)
18 (S : Submodule K V) : (b.restrict S).IsAlt := fun x => ha x
19
20 /-- Every summand in an orthogonal spanning family inherits nondegeneracy.
21 Neither finite-dimensionality nor an assumed restricted form is used. -/
22 theorem restricted_form_nondegenerate (b : LinearMap.BilinForm K V) (hn : b.Nondegenerate)
23 (S : ι → Submodule K V) (hspan : (⨆ i, S i) = ⊤)
24 (horth : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → ∀ x ∈ S i, ∀ y ∈ S j, b x y = 0) (i : ι) :
25 (b.restrict (S i)).Nondegenerate := by
26 constructor
27 · intro x hx
28 apply Subtype.ext
29 apply hn.1 (x : V)
30 have hk : (⨆ j, S j) ≤ (b x).ker := by
31 apply iSup_le
32 intro j y hy
33 change b x y = 0
34 by_cases hji : j = i
35 · subst j
36 exact hx ⟨y, hy⟩
37 · exact horth i j (Ne.symm hji) x x.property y hy
38 rw [hspan] at hk
39 intro y
40 exact hk (Submodule.mem_top : y ∈ (⊤ : Submodule K V))
41 · intro x hx
42 apply Subtype.ext
43 apply hn.2 (x : V)
44 have hk : (⨆ j, S j) ≤ (b.flip x).ker := by
45 apply iSup_le
46 intro j y hy
47 change b y x = 0
48 by_cases hji : j = i
49 · subst j
50 exact hx ⟨y, hy⟩
51 · exact horth j i hji y hy x x.property
52 rw [hspan] at hk
53 intro y
54 exact hk (Submodule.mem_top : y ∈ (⊤ : Submodule K V))
55
56 /-- A finite internal sum equivalence with the literal summation equation
57 supplies the spanning hypothesis used above. -/
58 theorem iSup_eq_top_of_equiv_sum [Fintype ι] (S : ι → Submodule K V)
59 (E : (∀ i, S i) ≃ₗ[K] V) (hE : ∀ x, E x = ∑ i, (x i : V)) :
60 (⨆ i, S i) = ⊤ := by
61 apply top_unique
62 intro v _
63 obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := E.surjective v
64 rw [hE]
65 exact Submodule.sum_mem _ (fun i _ => (le_iSup S i) (x i).property)
66
67 variable [FiniteDimensional K V]
68
69 /-- Actual restriction of an invertible ambient map to a forward-invariant
70 subspace. Surjectivity of the restriction is proved from its injectivity. -/
71 def restrictionEquiv (g : V ≃ₗ[K] V) (S : Submodule K V)
72 (hg : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ∈ S) : S ≃ₗ[K] S :=
73 LinearEquiv.ofInjectiveEndo (g.toLinearMap.restrict hg) (by
74 intro x y h
75 apply Subtype.ext
76 exact g.injective (congrArg Subtype.val h))
77
78 @[simp] theorem restrictionEquiv_coe (g : V ≃ₗ[K] V) (S : Submodule K V)
79 (hg : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ∈ S) (x : S) : (restrictionEquiv g S hg x : V) = g x := rfl
80
81 /-- The inverse of the restricted equivalence is the actual ambient inverse. -/
82 theorem restrictionEquiv_symm_coe (g : V ≃ₗ[K] V) (S : Submodule K V)
83 (hg : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ∈ S) (x : S) :
84 ((restrictionEquiv g S hg).symm x : V) = g.symm x := by
85 apply g.injective
86 rw [g.apply_symm_apply]
87 exact congrArg Subtype.val ((restrictionEquiv g S hg).apply_symm_apply x)
88
89 /-- Forward invariance under an invertible finite-dimensional map also gives
90 inverse invariance; it is not an extra source hypothesis. -/
91 theorem inverse_mem (g : V ≃ₗ[K] V) (S : Submodule K V)
92 (hg : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ∈ S) (x : V) (hx : x ∈ S) : g.symm x ∈ S := by
93 rw [← restrictionEquiv_symm_coe g S hg ⟨x, hx⟩]
94 exact ((restrictionEquiv g S hg).symm ⟨x, hx⟩).property
95
96 /-- Preservation of the ambient form gives preservation of its actual restriction. -/
97 theorem restrictionEquiv_form (b : LinearMap.BilinForm K V) (g : V ≃ₗ[K] V)
98 (hform : ∀ x y, b (g x) (g y) = b x y)
99 (S : Submodule K V) (hg : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ∈ S) (x y : S) :
100 b.restrict S (restrictionEquiv g S hg x) (restrictionEquiv g S hg y) =
101 b.restrict S x y := hform x y
102
103 /-- A fixed-point-free ambient automorphism remains so on each invariant summand. -/
104 theorem restrictionEquiv_fixed_eq_zero (g : V ≃ₗ[K] V)
105 (hfix : ∀ x, g x = x → x = 0) (S : Submodule K V)
106 (hg : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ∈ S) (x : S) (hx : restrictionEquiv g S hg x = x) : x = 0 := by
107 apply Subtype.ext
108 exact hfix x (congrArg Subtype.val hx)
109
110 /-- Each actual orthogonal summand has even dimension under the odd-characteristic
111 symplectic hypotheses. -/
112 theorem restricted_even_finrank (b : LinearMap.BilinForm K V) (ha : b.IsAlt)
113 (hn : b.Nondegenerate) (h2 : (2 : K) ≠ 0) (S : ι → Submodule K V)
114 (hspan : (⨆ i, S i) = ⊤)
115 (horth : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → ∀ x ∈ S i, ∀ y ∈ S j, b x y = 0) (i : ι) :
116 Even (Module.finrank K (S i)) :=
117 OddSymplectic.even_finrank (b.restrict (S i)) (restricted_isAlt b ha (S i))
118 (restricted_form_nondegenerate b hn S hspan horth i) h2
119
120 end PaperXI.OrthogonalSummands
Original file and source record
This copy matches the recorded source file. Its publication here does not change the work’s review status.
SHA-256: fa9f0303b80e64cd56907157d0dc0c86d1f3e34d1ebd579bf0614a9c89116898
Back to Paper XI: Packets, Arithmetic Realization, and Conditional Comparison