ASSUMPTION_REVIEW_BLOCK08.md

Machine Native Reasoning

ASSUMPTION_REVIEW_BLOCK08.md

Download original file

Original Markdown with line links

Assumption review — Block 08

New source admission: Core 5.3, label r:lowerbound. The book and all 30 preceding substantive modules are unchanged.

Formal object Required premise and checked boundary
Tree E Bool C h Literal finite report tree. Bool is the binary alphabet. A horizon is not the actual depth.
Model.Valid Nonempty current support, uniformly permitted experiment, actual post-state update, exactly the live children, common successful terminal.
Scope.immutable The complete modeled state is unchanged. A destructive reset fails this condition even if its eventual repair is valid.
Scope.singleton A fixed repair succeeds in at most one modeled state. Existence of a successful repair for every case is supplied by the actual successful tree; unused labels need not work.
Scope.query_cost One scalar natural-number unit per query. No cost of compilation or scope validation is included in this online measure.
Scope.terminal_cost One unit on every nonempty support. The proof does not impose an invalid empty-support maximum identity.
Leaves and records Every possible case reaches a singleton leaf, no impossible leaves are installed, unary queries stay counted.
Nat.clog Exact natural ceiling logarithm characterized by a power inequality, including n=1. No approximate real log.
profile to execute A maximizing live branch supplies an actual initial-state witness. Lower bound is not merely a loose profile overestimate.
Frontier closure Validity and simultaneous attainment of both coordinates are essential. Only one coordinate or a correct tree shape is insufficient.
Finite scope gate State, action and artifact types finite. The guard examines exact table fields and all finite support-dependent terminal costs, not names or old cache labels.
Negative scope result Means not admitted by this restricted theorem; does not imply infeasibility or falsity of every claim about the revised model.
Larger horizons The same certified tree is padded without inserting queries, so all larger finite horizons share the singleton frontier.
Stronger lower-bound scope Total permissions and a repair for every state are not necessary for a lower bound on an already successful valid tree. The source assumptions are included.

The general source proof was not weakened. Binary tree edge counting and logarithmic information bounds are established elementary mathematics, not priority claims. Same-kernel checking validates formal terms under the pinned imported environment; it does not certify model adequacy or independent origin.

Other PDFs for this work

Original file and source record

This copy matches the recorded source file. Its publication here does not change the work’s review status.

SHA-256: fb1db7a548b272babb5c16227d2f32f7832e5ddaf5d28dd57f0ef2436df65b84

Original source on GitHub

Back to Machine Native Reasoning