22_jet_filter.tex

ABC: source and evidence reader

22_jet_filter.tex

Download original file

This is the original TeX manuscript source. Use the paper’s PDF for typeset equations.

Read the typeset paper

Skip source text

1 \clearpage
2 \section{The universal mixed-weight jet filter}\label{sec:jet}
3 \subsection{One polynomial chooses the cancelling coefficients}
4 Let $m\ge0$ be an integer. Define
5 \[
6  P_m(X)=X\prod_{j=1}^m(jX-1)=\sum_{s=1}^{m+1}c_{m,s}X^s,
7 \]
8 and the formal series
9 \[
10  \Phi_m(t)=\frac1{(m+1)!}\sum_{s=1}^{m+1}c_{m,s}\Li_s(t).
11 \]
12 Here $\Li_s(t)=\sum_{k\ge1}t^k/k^s$ is first interpreted in $\Q[[t]]$. It also defines the usual analytic polylogarithm on $|t|<1$~\cite{DLMFPolylog}. The label $s$ is its weight. The contact order will follow from its coefficients, rather than from that label.
13 
14 \begin{theorem}[Exact jet cancellation]\label{thm:jet-contact}
15 \[
16  \Phi_m(t)=(-1)^m\sum_{k\ge1}\binom{k}{m+1}\frac{t^k}{k^{m+2}}.
17 \]
18 Thus
19 \[
20  \ord_0\Phi_m=m+1,\qquad
21  [t^{m+1}]\Phi_m=\frac{(-1)^m}{(m+1)^{m+2}}.
22 \]
23 \end{theorem}
24 \begin{proof}
25 The coefficient of $t^k$ is $P_m(1/k)/(m+1)!$. Direct substitution gives
26 \[
27  P_m(1/k)=\frac1k\prod_{j=1}^m\left(\frac jk-1\right)
28  =(-1)^m\frac{(k-1)\cdots(k-m)}{k^{m+1}}.
29 \]
30 Divide by $(m+1)!$ and multiply numerator and denominator by $k$ to get the asserted binomial coefficient. It vanishes for $1\le k\le m$ and first becomes one at $k=m+1$. The coefficient there is nonzero.
31 \end{proof}
32 For $m=0$, this is $\Phi_0=\Li_1$. For $m=1$,
33 \[
34  \Phi_1=(\Li_2-\Li_1)/2=-t^2/8-t^3/9-\cdots.
35 \]
36 The sign is part of the exact formula. Changing the weight alone would not produce the cancellation of the linear coefficient.
37 
38 \subsection{Small coefficient norm has a limited meaning}
39 The coefficients of $P_m$ alternate in sign. Its absolute-coefficient polynomial evaluated at one gives
40 \[
41  \sum_s|c_{m,s}|=\prod_{j=1}^m(j+1)=(m+1)!.
42 \]
43 Also $c_{m,1}=(-1)^m$, so the integer coefficient vector is primitive. After the displayed normalization, its coefficient $\ell^1$ norm is one.
44 
45 These are exact statements about a vector of rational coefficients. The number of participating weights grows with $m$. A norm of one for the coefficient vector does not bound the denominator, covolume or arithmetic height of a period realization. No such realization is built into the definition of $\Phi_m$.
46 
47 \subsection{The depleted local series}
48 For a prime $p$, delete the terms whose index is divisible by $p$:
49 \[
50  \Phi_{m,p}(t)=(-1)^m\sum_{p\nmid k}\binom{k}{m+1}\frac{t^k}{k^{m+2}}\in\Z_p[[t]].
51 \]
52 It converges when $v_p(t)>0$.
53 \begin{theorem}[Exact local jet valuation]
54 If $v_p(t)=e\ge1$, then
55 \[
56  v_p(\Phi_{m,p}(t))=
57  \begin{cases}
58  (m+1)e,&p\nmid m+1,\\
59  (m+2)e,&p\mid m+1.
60  \end{cases}
61 \]
62 \end{theorem}
63 \begin{proof}
64 If $p\nmid m+1$, the first nonzero coefficient remains the unit $(-1)^m/(m+1)^{m+2}$. Its term has valuation $(m+1)e$. Every later coefficient is $p$-integral, so every later term has strictly larger valuation.
65 
66 If $p\mid m+1$, that first index is deleted. The next index is $m+2$, which is a $p$-unit. Its coefficient is $(-1)^m/(m+2)^{m+1}$, also a unit. All later terms again have strictly larger valuation. The ultrametric inequality with a unique least-valuation term proves both equalities.
67 \end{proof}
68 
69 \subsection{An exact differential identity}
70 Let $D=t\,\dd/\dd t$ be the Euler operator. Termwise formal differentiation is valid. Applying $D^{m+2}$ multiplies the coefficient at $t^k$ by $k^{m+2}$, so
71 \[
72  D^{m+2}\Phi_m=(-1)^m\sum_{k\ge1}\binom{k}{m+1}t^k
73  =(-1)^m\frac{t^{m+1}}{(1-t)^{m+2}}.
74 \]
75 The final equality is the elementary generating function for the binomial coefficients.
76 
77 This universal formal identity and the prime-dependent depleted valuations can be studied simultaneously. They do not identify the different $\Phi_{m,p}$ as local values of one algebraic number. A product formula cannot be applied merely because these functions arose from one coefficient pattern.

Back to source controls

Other PDFs for this work

Original file and source record

This copy matches the recorded source file. Its publication here does not change the work’s review status.

SHA-256: 90aaf4bf5e02e3da94f3abbe761fe4d8e73eb67a7c623115d736c7b2cead7ee0

Original source on GitHub

Back to ABC: source and evidence reader