10 Fractional powers as spectral packet transfer
On this page · Permalink · Source line 1114
Reader roadmap
First identify the positive operator and its spectral packets. Then distinguish an exact spectral identity from a bound for a refinement mismatch. The gap-free certificate and the common-gap estimate have different hypotheses and different strengths.
Let \(L=L^*\ge0\) on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space. Its spectral resolution is
For \(\alpha>0\), define
The associated fractional semigroup is
Theorem 10.1: Fractional packet calculus
For \(\alpha,\beta>0\),
and for \(s,t\ge0\),
Every spectral packet \(P_j\) reduces \(L^\alpha\) and \(T_\alpha(t)\).
Read proof · Visual guide: The modes stay; their clocks change · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1134 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Proof of Theorem 10.1
All statements hold coefficientwise on the mutually orthogonal spectral projectors. For example,
Back to statement · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1146 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples

10.1 Square-root subordination
On this page · Permalink · Source line 1162
Theorem 10.2: Poisson subordination
For \(t>0\) and \(L\ge0\),
The integral converges in operator norm in finite dimension.
Read proof · Visual guide: A random diffusion clock · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1164 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Proof of Theorem 10.2
By the spectral theorem it suffices to prove the scalar identity
for \(\lambda\ge0\). This is the classical Gaussian integral after the substitution \(u=t/(2\sqrt s)\). Applying the identity to every eigenvalue and recombining the spectral projectors proves the operator formula.
Back to statement · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1178 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
10.2 Fractional naturality under a bounded refinement defect
On this page · Permalink · Source line 1190
Let \(A\ge0\) act on a fine Hilbert space, let \(B\ge0\) act on a coarse Hilbert space, and let \(C\) be a bounded coarsening map. Set
Theorem 10.3: Fractional intertwining theorem
For bounded nonnegative self-adjoint \(A\) and \(B\),
The improper integral converges in operator norm. Moreover,
If \(A,B\ge mI\) for some \(m>0\), then the stronger linear estimate holds:
In particular, exact generator intertwining \(CA=BC\) implies exact fractional intertwining \(CA^\alpha=B^\alpha C\).
Read proof · Visual guide: A gap changes the error scale · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1200 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Proof of Theorem 10.3
For \(0<\alpha<1\), the Balakrishnan formula gives
and likewise for \(B\). Using
and the rectangular resolvent identity
the difference of the two Balakrishnan integrals becomes the displayed resolvent-defect formula.
For small \(t\),
because the two positive resolvent factors are contractions. For large \(t\), the resolvent identity gives the bound \({\left\lVert D\right\rVert}/t\). Splitting the integral at
when \(C\) and \(D\) are nonzero yields
The zero cases are immediate.
If \(A,B\ge mI\), then both resolvents have norm at most \((t+m)^{-1}\), so
After \(t=mu\), the beta integral equals
which gives the linear estimate.
Back to statement · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1234 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Corollary 10.4: Fractional semigroup refinement
For \(s\ge0\),
Hence
Under the common gap \(A,B\ge mI\),
Read proof · Visual guide: A gap changes the error scale · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1294 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Proof of Corollary 10.4
Differentiate
and integrate from \(0\) to \(s\). Positive fractional semigroups are contractions; under the gap, the product of their two norm bounds is \(e^{-sm^\alpha}\).
Back to statement · Read statement and proof side by side · Permalink · Source line 1319 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Corollary 10.5: Fractional refinement towers
Let \(D_\ell=C_\ell A_{\ell+1}-A_\ell C_\ell\) in a bounded nonnegative self-adjoint tower, with \(\sup_\ell{\left\lVert C_\ell\right\rVert}\le M\). If
then the fractional defects
have summable operator norms. If the tower has a uniform gap \(m>0\), it is enough that \(\sum_\ell{\left\lVert D_\ell\right\rVert}<\infty\). On every bounded time interval, the series of corresponding fractional-semigroup defect norms converges uniformly. The maps may have different domain and codomain spaces; no operator sum across unrelated spaces is asserted.
Visual guide: Small at each level is not summable across levels · Permalink · Source line 1327 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples

Boundary 10.6: Unbounded and nonnormal generators
The theorem resolves fractional naturality for bounded nonnegative self-adjoint refinement systems and gives the exact estimate needed for finite discretization towers. For unbounded positive generators, the same resolvent argument requires a declared common-domain condition and a bounded extension of \(CA-BC\). Sectorial or nonnormal generators require their own contour calculus and resolvent bounds. Those domain questions are not inferred from the finite certificates.
Permalink · Source line 1346 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples
Boundary 10.7: Non-self-adjoint fractional powers
The spectral definition above is complete for finite self-adjoint positive operators. Sectorial and nonnormal operators require a resolvent or contour functional calculus; the same packet language can be used only after those analytic hypotheses are established.
Permalink · Source line 1350 · Claim record · Lean coverage · Code · Worked examples